First skeletal remains of Phoebodus found in Morocco

First skeletal remains of Phoebodus found in Morocco
Possible body reconstruction of (a) P. saidselachus sp. nov., Late Devonian, (b) T. gracia [11], Early Carboniferous, and (c) picture of C. anguineus [44], Recent. Credit: (c) Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2019). DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1336

An international team of researchers has found the first skeletal remains of Phoebodus—an ancient shark—in the Anti-Atlas Mountains in Morocco. In their paper published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the group describes the fossil and compares it to a modern shark and fish.

Ancient sharks that are long extinct left behind a lot of teeth—but very little other evidence of their existence. This is because their skeletons were made of soft cartilage instead of hard bone. Because of that, rare fossilized skeletons generate much excitement in the archeology community. In this new effort, the researchers report that they found a complete fossilized of Phoebodus, a shark that lived over 350 million years ago.

The shark fossil was found in a mountainous region of Morocco that had once been a shallow sea basin. The researchers also found several skulls and parts of another species of Phoebodus at the same site. Testing of the material in which the shark remains were fossilized revealed that the specimens were approximately 370 million years old. Prior to the find, the only evidence of Phoebodus was three teeth. The researchers note that Phoebodus went extinct in an early part of the Carboniferous—a very long time before many of its features evolved in other modern sea creatures.

In studying the fossilized skeleton, the researchers were able to see that when alive, the shark had a long, thin body (almost like an eel), a flat skull and a long jaw. They noted that it bore a striking resemblance to the modern frilled shark, though the two are not related. The , in particular, were very similar—round and pointy and inward-turning, rather than the more familiar serrated edges. Such sharks tend to grab prey and hold on to it like a bulldog and then swallow it whole. The researchers suggest the resemblance between the ancient shark and the modern shark may give researchers some ideas on how Phoebodus hunted. They also note that the ancient shark resembles the modern gar, as well. And while it is a fish and not a shark, it, too, might shed some light on how the ancient shark hunted.

First skeletal remains of Phoebodus found in Morocco
Phoebodus saidselachus sp. nov., (a–d) PIMUZ A/I 4712 and (e) PIMUZA/I 4656. (a) Ferruginous nodule containing cranial and postcranial remains; (b) drawing, scale bar, 200 mm; (c) detail of visceral skeleton, scale bar, 100 mm; (d) tooth, scale bar, 5 mm; (e) tooth in labial, aboral, baso-lateral and linguo-basal views, scale bar, 10 mm. adbc, anterior dorsal basal cartilage; bh, basihyal; cb, ceratobranchial; ch, ceratohyal; col, cololite; fs, fin spine; mc, Meckel`s cartilage; mpt, metapterygium; n, neurocranium; na, neural arches; pdbc, posterior dorsal basal cartilage; pq, palatoquadrate; rad, radials; sc, scapulacoracoid. (Online version in colour.). Credit: (c) Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2019). DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1336

More information: Linda Frey et al. The early elasmobranch Phoebodus : phylogenetic relationships, ecomorphology and a new time-scale for shark evolution, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2019). DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1336

© 2019 Science X Network

Citation: First skeletal remains of Phoebodus found in Morocco (2019, October 2) retrieved 26 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2019-10-skeletal-phoebodus-morocco.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Tracking evolution through teeth: The small-fry ancestor of the great white shark

536 shares

Feedback to editors