Scientists discover how essential methane catalyst is made

Carbon dioxide
Ball-and-stick model of carbon dioxide. Credit: Wikipedia

New ways to convert carbon dioxide (CO2) into methane gas for energy use are a step closer after scientists discovered how bacteria make a component that facilitates the process.

Recycling CO2 into energy has immense potential for making these emissions useful rather than a major factor in global warming. However, because the that can convert CO2 into methane, methanogens, are notoriously difficult to grow, their use in gas production remains limited.

This challenge inspired a team of scientists led by Professor Martin Warren, of the University of Kent's School of Biosciences, to investigate how a key molecule, coenzyme F430, is made in these bacteria.

Although F430 - the catalyst for the production process - is structurally very similar to the red pigment found in (haem) and the green pigment found in plants (chlorophyll), the properties of this bright yellow coenzyme allow methanogenic bacteria to breathe in and exhale methane.

By understanding how essential components of the process of biological methane production, methanogenesis, such as coenzyme F430 are made scientists are one step closer to being able to engineer a more effective and obliging methane-producing bacterium.

More information: Simon J. Moore et al, Elucidation of the biosynthesis of the methane catalyst coenzyme F430, Nature (2017). DOI: 10.1038/nature21427

Journal information: Nature

Provided by University of Kent

Citation: Scientists discover how essential methane catalyst is made (2017, February 22) retrieved 28 March 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2017-02-scientists-essential-methane-catalyst.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Effect of methane on climate change could be 25% greater than we thought

20 shares

Feedback to editors