Flowers that point to the sky may attract more moth pollinators

Plants that have flowers that point towards the sky may be better at attracting moth pollinators than plants that have 'shy' flowers that point sideways.

Researchers discovered this when they studied two species: Zaluzianskya natalensis, whose flowers point upwards, and Zaluzianskya microsiphon, whose flowers point sideways. Hawkmoths are the main of Z. natalensis flowers and showed a preference for its flowers. Long-tongued flies are the main pollinators of Z. microsiphon.

While Z. natalensis has a stronger scent to pollinators, artificially adding more scent to Z. microsiphon flowers had no effect on the numbers of that visited. Also, manipulating the flowers of Z. microsiphon to point upwards increased their appeal to hawkmoths, while manipulating the flowers of Z. natalensis to point sideways reduced their appeal. The white portion of the petals was more visible when flowers pointed upward.

"The results show that orientation of can result in between closely related species," said Dr. Diane Campbell, author of the New Phytologist study. Reproductive isolation refers to a situation where different species may live in the same area, but their properties prevent them from interbreeding.

More information: Diane R. Campbell et al. Reproductive isolation between species: the influence of volatiles and flower orientation on hawkmoth foraging choices , New Phytologist (2015). DOI: 10.1111/nph.13746

Journal information: New Phytologist

Provided by Wiley

Citation: Flowers that point to the sky may attract more moth pollinators (2015, November 16) retrieved 26 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2015-11-sky-moth-pollinators.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Ozone can reduce a flower's scent that's critical for attracting pollinators

22 shares

Feedback to editors