Apple "pinch-to-zoom" patent deemed invalid

People walk through the Apple retail store in Grand Central Terminal on December 10, 2012 in New York City.
People walk through the Apple retail store in Grand Central Terminal on December 10, 2012 in New York City. A filing in a high-stakes legal battle between Samsung and Apple revealed that a "pinch-to-zoom" patent central to the case has been deemed invalid.

A filing in a high-stakes legal battle between Samsung and Apple revealed that a "pinch-to-zoom" patent central to the case has been deemed invalid.

The patent was a centerpiece of a trial that ended in August with a jury ordering Samsung to pay Apple $1.05 billion in damages for illegally copying iPhone and iPad features for its flagship Galaxy S smartphones.

Samsung provided US Lucy Koh a copy of a preliminary determination that, upon review, the Apple pinch-to-zoom technology wasn't original enough to merit a patent.

Samsung hoped the filing would bolster its argument for a new trial or to have the slashed.

Since the verdict, US patent officials tentatively invalidated an Apple patent on technology that gives a "rubber-band" springing effect when a finger tugs at the edge of a touch-screen smartphone. That patent was also at issue at trial.

Koh on Monday denied Apple's request to ban a set of Samsung smartphones from the US market based on the jury's finding that the South Korean firm was guilty of infringing on six of the Cupertino, California-company's patents.

Even though Apple was victorious in the patent case, the and iPad maker failed to prove that the technology at issue was the driving factor in people's buying decisions, Koh reasoned in the ruling.

Samsung—the world's top mobile and smartphone maker—has appealed the verdict.

(c) 2012 AFP

Citation: Apple "pinch-to-zoom" patent deemed invalid (2012, December 20) retrieved 29 March 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2012-12-apple-pinch-to-zoom-patent-deemed-invalid.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Apple patent wielded against Samsung possibly invalid

0 shares

Feedback to editors