A terribly misleading headline.

Petry is not even https://www.natur...091-6... And there is at least one bambillion of another missing ingredients...


Irrelevant respectively wrong.

-It was Petry's dish ... ehm, lab et cetera, which is why she as senior is asked; and the paper is not in question from that anyway.

And the two identified ingredients are sufficient. Why do you even try to pretend that you did not read the article yet want to comment on it? Read the article, *then* comment - but sensibly, plz.