Meanwhile, when reality is actually considered, we will absolutely see more extreme weather due to Earth's weakening magnetic field, regardless of that political agreement.

Isn't this just sweet logic. As long as world leaders are sitting around a table in France talking about implementing an AGW agenda, then planet Earth holds off on warming itself, but the minute planet Earth finds out that the Paris Accords thing is being delayed for implementation then planet Earth tentacle like sensors pick up on the buzz & ramps up global warming.

Those planet Earth tentacles need to figure out how to stretch to the Sun before the predicted 2050 Sun Dimming event occurs.

The difference between the U.N. goal and the actual country commitments is a mere 1 C, which may seem negligible...

Sure, it's the difference between extreme weather events and total societal collapse. It only "seems negligible" because people don't understand climate science.


As for temperature "extremes", lets not forget that according to the global temperature records from 1850 to the present, the global average temperature has increased by about 1 to 1.2° C. That's roughly the temperature difference you feel when climbing about 100 meters (330 feet) higher up a hill or mountain. Not much at all and certainly not extreme


As demonstrated by aksdad. Thanks!

The words "global" and "average" continue to be complex scientific terms past the grasp of mere mortals apparently

Meanwhile, when reality is actually considered, we will absolutely see more extreme weather due to Earth's weakening magnetic field, regardless of that political agreement.

That's a joke, right?

Meanwhile, when reality is actually considered, we will absolutely see more extreme weather due to Earth's weakening magnetic field, regardless of that political agreement.

That's a joke, right?


There is no evidence that weakening magnetic field will significantly increase extreme weather events.

Sorry, don't know what went wrong there but didn't deliberately post that 9 times! I only meant to post that ONCE.

There is no evidence that weakening magnetic field will significantly increase extreme weather events.

How exactly do you figure? Weaker solar and Earth magnetic fields will allow more cosmic rays to bombard Earth's atmosphere, hence more extreme weather among other effects.

How I would like to see one paper addressing GW at the fundamental level of CO2 radiative absorption. Increased CO2 → Increased atmospheric energy → More destructive weather.

Don't you love such out of context statements like "Damages from extreme weather and climate events have been increasing, and 2017 was the costliest year on record," Diffenbaugh said. "These rising costs are one of many signs that we are not prepared for today's climate, let alone for another degree of global warming." What malarkey we have never prepared for the 1 in a 100 year or 500 year extreme. More people more destruction, dah. We've had a 12 year hiatus of hurricanes, built evermore communities in places, like the Gulf Coast, where they shouldn't be, and as the case of Puerto Rico ignore building codes. More people more damage. Then the odds catch up with us and CO2 is the culprit.

cont.

I tried to find a detailed description and mathematical layout of the simulation (assumed to be CLIMDEX) and stopped looking after 20 minutes.

One thing the atmosphere has not done is change temperatures at the altitudes predicted.

If anyone can identify a source where fundamental properties and/or coefficients of CO2 absorption can be found please provide direction. Also should you know of any place where a visible model in mathematical form may be found please provide such.

Science that threatens people is fake!

Science that threatens people is fake!


Just out of curiosity, what does this inane blanket statement cover? Our scientific knowledge of poisons? Our knowledge of necessary nutrient intake? Our knowledge of gravity?

Are you saying that gravity is just a scam to stop you exercising your God-given right to jump off buildings? #jumpagainstgravity

ROFLMAO

one more attempt to scare the herd into self destructive and costly "fixes" that won't, and aren't needed.


Weaker solar and Earth magnetic fields will allow more cosmic rays to bombard Earth's atmosphere, hence more extreme weather among other effects.

cantdrive85

How does
"more cosmic rays to bombard Earth's atmosphere"
imply
" more extreme weather"
?
And where is your evidence for such a causal link?
You do know it isn't cosmic rays that seeds hurricanes and tornadoes on Earth, right?

You do know it isn't cosmic rays that seeds hurricanes and tornadoes on Earth, right?

You know this with absolute certainty? You must be the "Superfantastic Science Guy".

https://principia...xpected/

You do know it isn't cosmic rays that seeds hurricanes and tornadoes on Earth, right?

You know this with absolute certainty?


I know this with sufficient certainty to call it fact just like I know with sufficient certainty that the Earth isn't flat to call it a fact that the Earth is round. It is because of this called "science".
Your link doesn't claim it is cosmic rays that seed hurricanes and tornadoes on Earth thus is irrelevant.

lets see what the science says shall we?
http://www.weathe...anes.htm

And that is relevant, because?
First, tornadoes and hurricanes are not the only extreme weather events under discussion, that is why it is relevant.
Second, your link to a "science" website for children is swell. But what causes low pressure? It is the electrodynamic properties of the matter/atmosphere which creates the high/low pressure zones. Ultimately these processes are driven by electric potential which determines the pressure systems. As the Earth's magnetosphere weakens even small fluctuations in the Sun's activity/cosmic rays can have greater impacts.

@idiot eu cult acolyte cd
your link to a "science" website for children is swell
he was trying to make sure you could understand it as you've only demonstrated a 5th grade comprehension of science and reading
It is the electrodynamic properties
... Ultimately these processes are driven by electric potential
no

and I can prove that easily:
- if you simply overlay all the storms and extreme weather events with the exposed power grid and transfer stations, you will not find a correlation supporting your belief

Also note: there are less "electrodynamic properties" in the ocean than on first world national lands, so why do hurricanes start in oceans?

these land areas in any developed nation, per your claim, should seed extremely violent weather

they do not

moreover: influence isn't the same thing as seeding, so your idiocy is invalidated simply because you can't comprehend basic English

But what causes low pressure?

cantdrive85

NOT cosmic rays for sure. Your baseless claims are idiotic.
Are you a climate scientist? If not, how can you know about it better than them? THEY don't say cosmic rays causes low pressure in the weather systems.


Are you a climate scientist?


I think it might be better for me to have asked instead;

Are you a meteorologist or an atmospheric physicists?

although I guess a climate scientist would do.

the amount of money spent on paris could already have been used for co2 sequestration/and or energy usage and start putting a dent in the amount of co2. Misguided funds once again. stupid humans, you lack cohesion, which will be your undoing. most of you will be alive when your planet dies!

But what causes low pressure?

NOT cosmic rays for sure. Your baseless claims are idiotic.

I never said cosmic rays cause low pressure, you are obviously an idiot if you think I said such a thing. What I said;
"But what causes low pressure? It is the electrodynamic properties of the matter/atmosphere which creates the high/low pressure zones." cantdrive85
The primary underlying cause of all weather is due to the electrodynamic properties of the matter/atmosphere, as such it is greatly affected by electrodynamics.
Are you a climate scientist?

Appeal to authority much? The problem with climate science is that it must rely on assumptions, beliefs, and theories from other disciplines to develop their own theory/models. Sadly, the climate scientists rely upon the plasma ignoramuses (astrophysicists) to tell them how the Sun-Earth energy transfer occurs. Needless to say, they are so completely wrong it in turn causes the climate scientists to be mislead.