Hip, hip, hurrah. Here is a self-critique of the method by which GW effect is postulated. This lends more creditability to climate science research than the linear extrapolations of a poorly correlating data set to some 85 years into the future. This is what should be seen in scientific research. It is inherent to the human psyche to be bias to the goodness of one's own research and publications. Famine follows war much more than war follows famine. Syria was initially political conflict which morphed into sectarian conflict. Darfur was Islamic cleansing and Sudan was a civil war with some sectarian component.

For the ignorant and rabid thought police labeling anyone who doesn't right think, this is not a Denier comment. This is an observation by one who is looking for proper academic discourse. This adds more credibility to climate science than herd following.

i want to hear from the thought police on this one ! LOL

So the Bilderberg attack on Libya was caused by AGW , maybe Vietnam also .

This adds more credibility to climate science than herd following

This is not a climatology paper it is a sociological study.

Syria and Sudan are english speaking? Perhaps this new effort is the biased one.....

This adds more credibility to climate science than herd following

This is not a climatology paper it is a sociological study.

This is the title of this article and the paper "Sampling bias might be distorting view of upheaval due to global warming", published in the journal Nature Climate Change

Climate driven adverse social behavior is the subject. Isn't this the stuff usually the fodder of AGW alarmists and Climate Change porn?

These dudes are screwed. Good luck getting grants after deviating from the 'narrative'.

Indirectly supports the efforts and findings of Africa's ongoing "Great Green Wall" project.

This is the title of this article and the paper "Sampling bias might be distorting view of upheaval due to global warming", published in the journal Nature Climate Change

Climate driven adverse social behavior is the subject. Isn't this the stuff usually the fodder of AGW alarmists and Climate Change porn?

No. The title that you are reffering to was written by Bob Yirka of Phys.org
This is the title of the paper that is published on Nature Climate Change: Sampling bias in climate–conflict research. https://www.natur...8-0068-2

As much as the porn part of your comment; I do not personally read all the articles and reports on climate... I am not obsessed about that. I just consider AGW a state of fact that will concern my children and grandchildren. Too bad for you if you get aggravated every time an article comes out with the word climate in it.

No. The title that you are reffering to was written by Bob Yirka of Phys.org
This is the title of the paper that is published on Nature Climate Change: Sampling bias in climate–conflict research. https://www.natur...8-0068-2

As much as the porn part of your comment; I do not personally read all the articles and reports on climate... I am not obsessed about that. I just consider AGW a state of fact that will concern my children and grandchildren. Too bad for you if you get aggravated every time an article comes out with the word climate in it.

I agree that the paper is "Sampling bias in climate–conflict research"
Courtland Adams, Tobias Ide, Jon Barnett & Adrien Detges. Further, on reading the abstract you have the proper take. My mistake to place all relance on Bob Yirka. Please excuse my error. Perhaps my bias effected my read. Thanks
.

Global warming impacts on mutual political relations and conflicts in some countries !! The most influential factor in triggering conflicts and wars is the Latin proverb "WANT YOUR GOD!" Such a message and provocation of mischief comes from great powers, which could mean that they are the triggers of such a "global warming" and provoking wars. And those who talk about such a connection are from these powerful states. Since they do not know who provokes global warming, now it is necessary to make "human bunchers" to "explore the causes" of global warming.
If, indeed, we want to find out who is the culprit for this warming, we must naturally think. Global warming is a consequence of the mutual relations between the planets and the sun in our solar system. HOW? - READ AND GET ANSWER!

What many here have not considered is that the sampling bias may undercount rather than overcount climate conflict.