BUT: since God is involved, it is not acceptable to the atheist naturalistic religious dogma of big bang, billions of years, nebular accretion, abiogenesis and darwinian evolution.
And these authors conveniently ignore a paper just released a couple months ago which shows by observation that the Sun's fields cannot be created in this way. But who cares about science?
"It's one thing to have well-developed theories, but it's another thing to really demonstrate it in a controlled laboratory setting where you can make all these kinds of measurements about what's going on," Lamb said. "Now that we can do it, we can poke it and probe it."
"The paper, published this week in Nature Communications, is the first laboratory demonstration of a theory, explaining the magnetic field of numerous cosmic bodies, debated by physicists for nearly a century."
The only real explanation that makes sense is that proposed by Dr Russel Humphreys whereby God used the magnetic fields generated by the alignment of spin of hydrogen atoms in water molecules to create the initial magnetic fieldWell since god could wiggle his nose and make anything do absolutely anything, your theory is not falsefiable. But godders still make the effort to concoct half-assed theories that they claim are science.
And these authors conveniently ignore a paper just released a couple months ago which shows by observation that the Sun's fields cannot be created in this way. But who cares about science?
So now laboratory-based experiments aren't good enough for you and only observational accounts are accurate? That's neato.
but that is too inconvenient for the dark sciences because they have so much invested and even more to lose.
So now laboratory-based experiments aren't good enough for you and only observational accounts are accurate? That's neato.
If the observation does not support the theory or experiment based on that theory what does science tell you should be done with the theory and experiment? Of course observational evidence trumps theory and the experiments but that is too inconvenient for the dark sciences because they have so much invested and even more to lose.
... If we were able to stabilize one of these things and maintain a magnetic field of sufficient size, could it be something we could use on a space station/ship of some kind to protect the inhabitants from radiation in space? Or are there other anomalies issues that go along with this that would make that prohibitive?@thisisminesothere
That's great! But.....the better question is what create the highly charged plasma in the cosmos in the first place? Electric fields perhaps? Oh those create magnetic fields when the electric field is moving.....
Check out the work of Anthony Perat or even the Nobel prize winner, Banned Alfven. https://en.m.wiki...rg/wiki/
......what create the highly charged plasma in the cosmos in the first place?
What 'highly charged' plasma? Most of it is either neutral or singly ionised.
Besides religion and science realistically have nothing to do with each other. The existence or non existence of God has no impact whatsoever on Science.
But godders still make the effort to concoct half-assed theories that they claim are science.Perhaps you should bother to read the paper or look at the confirmations of the predictions 2 decades later.
Observation: there are magnetic fields in various places throughout the universe.
Theory: it may be a dynamo effect.
Experiment: dynamo looks a very good fit.
True, it might look like that now but do not forget the philosophy behind it:
What 'highly charged' plasma? Most of it is either neutral or singly ionised.
Says the plasma ignoramus. Apparently ions and electrons are "neutral"....
Tell me, what does a neutral hydrogen atom consist of?
What is the overall charge of the solar wind?
thinks they may be due to Langmuir waves or exploding double layers! I kid you not.
The article, in case you didn't read it, is about the large scale magnetism throughout the universe
The solar wind is quasi-neutral (as measured) over lengths of ~ > 10m. If it weren't, then a whole host of spacecraft that have been immersed in it might have noticed.
Well. it'll have x ions and x electrons. +x + (-x) = 0. And they'll be massively outnumbered by neutrals.
Well. it'll have x ions and x electrons. +x + (-x) = 0. And they'll be massively outnumbered by neutrals.
Well, I guess if your equation says so, it must be! BTW, the ionosphere is a fraction of 1% ionized and it behaves as an electrodynamic plasma so once again your equation is bupkis! Lest we not forget the observed magnetic fields in these "neutral" clouds, thems fancy magnetical fields must be magically created! Let me guess, you deity Einstein must have created them when he set off the big bang creation event.
Langmuir waves are the result of a Langmuir burst, nice strawman... And who'da thunk that actual plasma processes would be happening in plasmas ILO pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo such as the breaking field lines of MRx.
Yep, such as the Van Allen probes which detected thousands of double layers in parallel that equated to 1,000,000 volts potential drop in near Earth space. Sounds like your beliefs are bupkis
Plasma processes occur over at least 14 orders of magnitude and very possibly 28 orders, either of which describes the above.
Well, you certainly have no scientifically viable hypothesis, do you?
So where is the evidence for these galaxy spanning currents?
Here is an article that describes them on a couple different scales;
https://phys.org/...axy.html
What do we get?@jonesdave
Let us also not forget the "magnetic portals" (Birkeland currents) which connect with the Earth every 8 minutes?
https://science.n...oct_ftes
Evidence for a flux transfer event generated by multiple X-line reconnection at the magnetopause
http://onlinelibr...219/full
No, no pseudoscientific claptrap concepts are needed to explain these plasma processes.
The universe is highly magnetic, with everything from stars to planets to galaxies producing their own magnetic fields. Astrophysicists have long puzzled over these surprisingly strong and long-lived fields, with theories and simulations seeking a mechanism that explains their generation.
And here is the pseudoscientific claptrap Belcher tries to pull-off. Note, astrophysicists almost always treat EM theory in the same incorrect way in which Belcher uses them.
http://aapt.scita....1531577
In fact, the most interesting plasma physics occurs precisely where and because this equation is not satisfied, such as the auroral acceleration region, ***magnetic field reconnection***, turbulence, shocks, and many wave modes
Both the large scale average electric field and the fine scale field observed during a magnetopause crossing show the existence of significant tangential electric field components on both sides of the magnetopause, ***in agreement with the requirements of reconnection theories***
In case the magnetic field varies with time, the geometry near neutral points may change in such a way that it is legitimate to speak of a 'field-line reconnection' We cannot exclude the possibility that some of the field-line reconnection formalism may be applicable, but this remains to be proved.
So, there is Falthammar denying MRx
FredJose
Feb 9, 2018The main problem with this experiment and what it purports to show is that the big bang requires all stars, galaxies and planets to have formed by themselves with no outside intelligence whatsoever. Thus, in contrast, here we have intelligent beings using sophisticated machinery to generate something that they hope will explain how all the magnetic fields of those naturalistic objects arose and are sustained. There could not be a bigger disconnect if you tried. This is clearly reflected by the simulations that succeed beyond the wildest expectations but then the application falls flat on it's face in real life.
There still is no explanation for the continued existence of earth's magnetic field.