"It's wondrous (out there), with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid."

- Q in Star Trek TNG (Season 2, Episode 16)

Billions of planets in billions of galaxies, or maybe, trillions of planets in trillions of galaxies. The more time goes by, the more this quote from Star Trek, like many others, looks right.

........and still no DM Cosmic Fairy Dust observed.

Yet the scientific principles, which are the basis of the technology developed for the research described in this article? Continue to support the hypothesis that DM exists. And explains why it is invisible to all but gravitational influence.

The only failure Benni? Is in your lack of competency to understand scientific evidence.

Yet the scientific principles, which are the basis of the technology developed for the research described in this article? Continue to support the hypothesis that DM exists. And explains why it is invisible to all but gravitational influence.

The only failure Benni? Is in your lack of competency to understand scientific evidence.


I can solve Differential Equations, what's the level of your math skills?

Guys, he can solve differential equations. He's darn well qualified.

@Benni
Ok then, solve this one;

dN/dt = -N/T

Yet the scientific principles, which are the basis of the technology developed for the research described in this article? Continue to support the hypothesis that DM exists. And explains why it is invisible to all but gravitational....


It's not the pinciple but the priori foundation. "Give me one small miracle and we'll explain the rest" that's why the hypothesis exists, but it's completely unnecessary. A big part of it is the stupidity in thinking math is empirical evidence. There is no one to one relationship to reality and our calculations have led us astray as evident by science history. Garbage in = garbage out. For a generation the vertical electric field was denied by established science because we had the math to prove otherwise. Closed minds like Captain stupid and Jones Dumb shutting down science progress because of personal beliefs to arrogant to consider maybe they don't know what they don't know.
Rant over carry on.

Chris Reeve MKII ^^^^^^^^

Closed minds like Captain stupid and Jones Dumb shutting down science progress because of personal beliefs to arrogant to consider maybe they don't know what they don't know.


Wrong, woo boy. We dismiss the idiotic rantings of EU nutters because they are scientifically illiterate junk. Electric Sun? Lol. Electric comets? That went well, didn't it? Electric craters? Dear me. See what I mean? It's all predicated on the moron Velikovsky's lunacy. Nobody takes that s*** seriously. In short, EU is crap, followed by a bunch of scientifically illiterate mythologists.

Yet the scientific principles, which are the basis of the technology developed for the research described in this article? Continue to support the hypothesis that DM exists. And explains why it is invisible to all but gravitational....


It's not the pinciple but the priori foundation. "Give me one small miracle and we'll explain the rest" that's why the hypothesis exists, but it's completely unnecessary. A big part of it is the stupidity in thinking math is empirical evidence. There is no one to one relationship to reality and our calculations have led us astray as evident by science history. Garbage in = garbage out. For a generation the vertical electric field was denied by established science because we had the math to prove otherwise. Closed minds like Captain stupid and Jones Dumb shutting down science progress because of personal beliefs to arrogant to consider maybe they don't know what they don't know.
Rant over carry on.


What a dumb phark.....

@Benni
Ok then, solve this one;

dN/dt = -N/T


.........ask Schneibo. You already screw up one of the most simple DE's anyone can put up, now you try another. You Journalists should first learn to do Algebra before copying stuff off the internet like you did this one.

@Benni
@Benni
Ok then, solve this one;

dN/dt = -N/T


.........ask Schneibo. You already screw up one of the most simple DE's anyone can put up, now you try another. You Journalists should first learn to do Algebra before copying stuff off the internet like you did this one.


So, let me get this right. You do not recognise this simple differential equation?

LOL. LOL. LOL, Oh please stop, you're killing me!

@Benni
What if I solved it for you.....?

N(t)=N(0)exp(-t/T)

Do you recognise it now?

@Benni
...
Do you recognise it now?
he absolutely does *not* recognize it because he's lied this whole time about being able to do differential equations - heck, he can't even do basic math!
See: http://phys.org/n...als.html

http://phys.org/n...ood.html

LOL

of course, I am adding this thread to his growing list of threads where he gets outed for epically failing to be able to do any differential equations

Thanks, @RNP !
LOL

Electric crators are accepted Jones Dumb
http://onlinelibr...200/full

We have had decades of evidence comets inner coma's were ionized JonesDumb
https://www.scien...75901153

The Electric sun model at least fits with all the observational data you just need to catch up Dark matter woo boy JonesDumb

Hey Zzzzzzzzz go back to sleep pin head at least Jones can offer substance.