"There are certain things you can't learn by having only one satellite—you need simultaneous observations at different locations."

This is a very salient fact that is relevant to many aspects of space plasma phenomena, don't tell jonesdumb though as he is convinced his narrow myopic POV is valid.

@idiot illiterate pseudoscience eu cult member

"There are certain things you can't learn by having only one satellite—you need simultaneous observations at different locations."

This is a very salient fact that is relevant to many aspects of space plasma phenomena...

1- false claim

because

2- PPPL.gov
and
https://scholar.g...+physics

epic fail showing that eu cult members are illiterate and don't know about the multiple plasma physics labs all around the world that prove their idiocy is cult driven dogma based upon delusional claims from non scientists attempting to create a new religion (a la Hubbard)

"There are certain things you can't learn by having only one satellite—you need simultaneous observations at different locations."

This is a very salient fact that is relevant to many aspects of space plasma phenomena, don't tell jonesdumb though as he is convinced his narrow myopic POV is valid.

Oh, I think multiple spacecraft observations are just fine! Such as:

Ion-scale secondary flux ropes generated by magnetopause reconnection as resolved by MMS
http://onlinelibr...747/full

And just in case CD doesn't know what MMS is:
https://en.wikipe..._Mission

There was an equivalent ESA mission called Cluster;
https://en.wikipe...cecraft)

It (they) saw some interesting things too:
Cluster encounter of a magnetic reconnection diffusion region in the near-Earth magnetotail on September 19, 2003
http://onlinelibr...794/full

Forrest Mozer is a co-author on that paper. He has co-authored with Falthammar, and was often cited by him.

And one shouldn't forget THEMIS;

https://en.wikipe...i/THEMIS

THEMIS observations of modified Hall fields in asymmetric magnetic field reconnection
http://onlinelibr...033/full

Mozer, again.

One of these days you will understand the difference between measurements and interpretation. Claims of MRx involves interpretation of the measurements.

@idiot moronic illiterate pseudoscience eu cult member cd

One of these days you will understand the difference between measurements and interpretation. Claims of MRx involves interpretation of the measurements

well that should be easily proven then with experimentation and demonstration like the 100K measurements and experiments at PPPL

so where is your scientific refute?

not your "because [x] said so..." refute, which is argument from authority
nor your "because [x] is just wrong" which is argument from ignorance
nor your russels teapot
nor your "because thunderdolts..." pseudoscience

no claims
show where the MRX experiments are debunked using the same methodology that current electrical engineers use to show MRX is real

captain obvious says: idiot illiterate troll is illiterate idiot

captain obvious says: idiot illiterate troll is illiterate idiot

Fair point.

One of these days you will understand the difference between measurements and interpretation. Claims of MRx involves interpretation of the measurements.

And Mozer & Falthammar interpreted them as MRx. End of argument. Eh?

One of these days you will understand the difference between measurements and interpretation. Claims of MRx involves interpretation of the measurements.

Not quite sure what the point of taking measurements is if one can not interpret them.

"Look, I have 63MB of measurement data from the latest plasma ignoramus experiment we did! So many beautiful columns and rows of data!"
"Great. Go ahead and store that somewhere, since we can't analyze and interpret it per CD85. Good job taking those measurements."