I would be MUCH more interested about what the obsession with President Trump's tweets says about the reader's personality. :-)

It's articles like this that are making the name Trump the most recognized in the world. You notice they don't say Donald Trump or President Trump just Trump. As if there is only one and he is so important we should automatically know who is being talked about. This is the greatest tribute the writer could give to anyone.

No one bothers to refer to Führer und Reichskanzler Adolf Hitler. Just Adolf or Hitler alone and we automatically know who is being talked about. This is the greatest tribute the writer could give to anyone?

This is the greatest tribute the writer could give to anyone?

Yes, absolutely! Hitler was a common name yet when you say it we all only think of one man. Just like Churchill, Stalin, Caesar, Jesus etc. I made no judgement in my comment about the worth of a person only about their name recognition.

When you just say Trump, more and more you only think of one man.
Another good example is "Alexander the Great".Since he had multiple words tied to his name, those words need to be used in order for everyone to know who you are talking about.

"The Twitter messages of Donald J. Trump, the entrepreneurial businessman turned US president, show that he is creative, competitive and a rule-breaker, but also has neurotic tendencies."

Nothing but sugar coat. Trump is a pharken psycho. PERIOD. Unless you want to talk TREASON.

You notice they don't say Donald Trump or President Trump just Trump

You mean like obama?

When you just say Trump, more and more you only think of one man

You mean like obama?

Trump is a pharken psycho. PERIOD.

You mean like debby wasserman schultz?

"The Daily Caller's Rosiak said one of the allegations against the brothers Awan was that "they were sending information to an offsite server and when you look at their backgrounds, these guys have been accused of fraud repeatedly in civil lawsuits."

"Wasserman Schultz, much to the confusion of the public, reportedly fought with Capitol Police to allow the brothers to gain access to their laptops instead of expressing concern over the fact that her IT personnel were allegedly hacking sensitive information."

-Unless you want to talk TREASON.

Listened to an interesting shawn hannity program last night. A woman called in from britain to describe how one-sided the news is over there. She goes to the trouble of using youtube to watch the conservative talk show hosts and news programs here because that point of view is simply not easily available to euros.

This in contrast to liberals over here who actively avoid info which may compromise their fragile Weltanschuung.

Gosh, I hate it when those two follow my comment with one of their own. I have ignored both of them because they are trolls, so have no idea of what they said. But it's always the same. Hate filled rhetoric and unsubstantiated slander against someone(anyone).
It's a shame they aren't important enough to sue for slander, since that is breaking the law, or at least a moral law. But since they feel special, I guess what is unacceptable in their eyes for everybody else, is ok for them.