For completeness, this analysis should indicate how much of a contribution all these actions have to the global production of GHG. The answer is: Not Much. Knock yourself out if you want to live like an ascetic, but it isn't going have much affect on the environment. It will have a big affect on you, though.
When our overlords who are pushing the GW scam start doing what they want the prols to do, I might start taking it seriously.
Or just happily ignore the "man-made global warming myth" which has no observable evidence to support it and enjoy your life. There, doesn't that feel better? Myths make entertaining movies but, like vampires and zombies, they aren't real.
have NO kids. vhemt.org
Or just happily ignore the "man-made global warming myth" which has no observable evidence to support it
Yep, Giggler here presents the central complaint --ie, "thinking"-- of the Denierside
....
"For example, a woman in the United States who adopted the six non-reproductive changes in Table 3 would save about 486 tons of CO2 emissions during her lifetime, but, if she were to have two children, this would eventually add nearly 40 times that amount of CO2 (18,882 t) to the earth's atmosphere...."
From: http://www.biolog...tudy.pdf
Sun Frost Refrigerator RF 16 I think, R 134 refrigerant, 19 years and still going strong, no loss of refrigerant yet.
I'm guessing a worldwide genocide might make a dent in CO2, and that unfortunately seems the most likely future for most of us the way things are headed.
For completeness, this analysis should indicate how much of a contribution all these actions have to the global production of GHG. The answer is: Not Much. Knock yourself out if you want to live like an ascetic, but it isn't going have much affect on the environment. It will have a big affect on you, though.
Change to an electric car. Another irresponsible lazy green myth,
The pollution from construction of a new vehicle alone is enough that it's unlikely in it's entire lifetime to offset it.
Keep the car you have for as long as possible, even if it's a gas guzzler, that's way more efficient that digging yet more resources out of the ground.
Odd that three of the items are about buying a new car, but no mention of driving fewer miles. Cars that use less energy only promote longer commutes: the auto mileage rules gave the US our superburbias. If you live a mile from work and shopping (I do), the energy source of your vehicle matters very little.
The "have one fewer child" recommendation is really silly, it is the only one among their recommendations whose effects cannot be reliably predicted-Except that religion-driven overpopulation is the greatest threat the world faces today. The major religions have all survived by outgrowing and overrunning their now-extinct adversaries.
I'm guessing a worldwide genocide might make a dent in CO2
michael_frishberg
Jul 11, 2017