The message should be "representative of humanity and planet Earth".
So we might be of interest to a "butterfly collector"
Suppose you are a technologically advanced superpower and you discover some backward tribe on an island. What do you do? Do you wipe them out? And if so: why? They have nothing you want. So you ignore them.
We're always projecting our motives and emotions onto other species (fear, greed, sadism, ...)
Suppose you are a standard representative of the human species, and you discover a small patch of mould starting to grow on the ceilling in your bathroom. Do you "wipe it out"? And if so: why? It has nothing you want, and it is completely harmless in its current state & form. So you ignore it?
poses a threat to your healthIn its current state & form (small patch on the ceilling) it is completely harmless.
you want a clean bathroomIgnoring the aesthetical aspect - Yes, you want to keep it clean to minimize any potential threats to your health.
But if you find a piece of mold in the woods - what do you do? Wipe it out?No. It was there long before humans even existed, and in its natural habitat is part of a balanced ecosystem, which keeps it "in check" - eg. prevents it from spreading excessively.
Where's the convenience in so much advanced aliens wiping us out?The convenience is in keeping potential future hazards at a minimum. Just like we do with disinfection, deratization, etc..
Ignoring the aesthetical aspect
t could become an "inconvenience" at some point
It was there long before humans even existed
Humans are not a 'potential future hazard' to something that advanced@AA_P
we've demonstrated the ability to learn very quickly
and we're a very reckless species (as a whole) that doesn't have a problem wiping out themselves, let alone strange unknown anything
we could be a food source though
Food source? How far would you travel for takeout?@Otto
Our transition to machine life is unavoidable and inevitableactually, i see this as more probable than anything, but i also don't think we will live to see it
Being aggressive in a multi-way society isn't a long-term winning strategy@AA_P
Unlikelylike i said - more satire than reality
So have they (presumably).@AA_P
something is universal/out there in large numbers or it is uniquewe don't see civilizations, nor do we see advanced technology... so where is it all?
Meatlife...We all resent it dont we?@Otto
@OttoAnd the only reason a machine singularity would need to travel is to relocate to a safer and more sustainable location. Being concerned with the long run, it would consume no more than was absolutely necessary to survive.
not "travel for"... but just "fresh meat"
and meant more as satire than serious
we don't see civilizations, nor do we see advanced technology... so where is it all?
but then again, humans don't tend to learn from their own history (usually), otherwise we would be a mite more peaceful towards each other, wouldn't we?
you know... "how sweet. fresh meat"? - freddy
Megastructures: These make no sense to me as the sign of an advanced civilizations. I'd rather expect them having transferred to smallish, hardy - and above all efficient - substrates. We're already miniaturizing everything we can think of (from phones to computers to colliders) - what's the point of building big?
EyeNStein
Nov 21, 2016If they are more peaceful than we are i.e. more willing to share resources and work and rewards: They are less of a threat to us than our fellow man is at present.
Similarly an AI singularity is more likely to tell us humans not to be such plonkers; than it is to attack us over free access to silicon ones and zeros.