We only know nothing like them existed in the LUCA...
Anyone who thinks that any aspect of evolution has been placed into the context of neo-Darwinian theory should revisit Darwin's claims about "conditions of life" and Koonin's claims that the role of viruses was ignored.
No experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect has ever been linked to the imaginary/emergent LUCA.
@JVK
If you were honest you would admit your problem with LUCA is religious not scientific
Considering how often you've mis-represented the work of others and quoted out of context and that you hawk a perfume based on pseudoscience it's evident honesty and you are strangers.
...these insights have nothing to do with JVK's articles about pheromones...
The RNA and viruses are also engaged in horizontal gene transfer, which represents the dual, i.e. Lamarckian form of otherwise Darwinian evolution.
You left out that Koonin still upholds the role of mutations and natural selection in evolution.
During last century the mainstream science (both physics both biology) evolved into a strictly deterministic system of thinking, so it did a decent bit of work in revealing of deterministic connections of our reality - but what it missed systematically are the dual, emergent/holistic mechanisms.
that communicated with pheromones -- like all species from microbes to man.
Humans don't communicate with pheromones, despite your huckster business plan.
http://www.ncbi.n...K200980/
Humans don't communicate with pheromones, despite your huckster business plan.
That is precisely what was shown via the link from microRNAs to adhesion proteins in the context of the sequencing of the octopus genome and by researchers from the Mayo Clinic in Florida who linked microRNAs and adhesion proteins to all pathology.
evolution has many mechanisms for speciation hardwired, which provide, that newly established species don't mix together.
It's known, that women or men choose their partners by smell@zephir/docile et al
dumb downvoterstwitchy? maybe
The difference is that I am not a Wiki-idiotnope! just a plain old religious pseudoscience idiot (that doesn't comprehend or accept definitions)
Ryszard Maleszka once commented that he did not want to see any of this "creationist crap," which has since linked@jk
http://perfumingt...r-genes/PSEUDOSCIENCE SITE promoting creationist dogma
JVK
Aug 29, 2015I suggest that calibration of the fossil record should also include evidence of no morphological change in bacteria living in the ocean sediments for the past ~2 billion years, and "re-evolution" of the bacterial flagellum that occurred "over-the-weekend."
Somewhere in between may lie an accurate representation of how much biodiversity can arise in any given time in any or all species via the biophysically constrained nutrient-dependent protein folding chemistry that links RNA-mediated events to all extant biodiversity via the conserved molecular mechanisms of cell type differentiation and the physiology of reproduction in all genera.