"Human activities might start something in motion by releasing carbon gases but natural systems, even in remote places like the Arctic, may add to this problem of climate change,"

Who decided this was a problem? This is where modern science continues to go astray. Report facts, leave your interpretations of good or bad out of it.

Give us your money, or the earth gets it.

Give a monkey a brain, and he'll think he's the center of the universe.

Climates change. nature is far to big and powerful for humans to control. Guess what that means? The people taking your money offering your momma earth's salvation are scamming you. Big Time.

Give us your money, or the earth gets it.

Yes, this statement gets more profound the more you use it. This article is about the impact a thawing permafrost will have as a positive feedback mechanism for climate change - possibly a catastrophic one if not the feared "time bomb". I fail to see what money has to do with any of that, especially as a shift to renewables will cost you less overall.

Why do conservatives assume we all have their character?

"Give a monkey a brain, and he'll think he's the center of the universe."

denglish claims with typical propaganda mutterings

Give us your money, or the earth gets it.
Give a monkey a brain, and he'll think he's the center of the universe.
Climates change. nature is far to big and powerful for humans to control. Guess what that means? The people taking your money offering your momma earth's salvation are scamming you. Big Time.

Where is the Science denglish ?

The Physics denglish ?

The Proof that CO2 is NOT warming ?

denglish, why are you here, it you offer NOTHING but barbs to obfuscate, why is that ?

This is a Science site, offer some useful links for mature dialectic, why can't you ? eg Start here:-
http://en.wikiped..._forcing

and learn some basic physics re radiative heat transfer
https://en.wikipe...transfer

Is there anything denglish to compare with CO2's radiative forcing, anything anywhere can u find it ?