Meanwhile, scientists have yet to tie even a single death to Fukushima radiation and even the most pessimistic predictions of the alarmist linear no threshold statistical models put the number of deaths at low hundreds. Face it, nuclear is the safest way to generate electricity. Wont be long before Japan embraces their nuclear program again, that is unless they want to burn fossil fuels forever..
Try this one, MM.
http://new.atmc.j...9b07f31c
Now, MM can go to http://fukushima-diary.com and get some information on the amounts of radiation bleeding into our environment continuously.
Are you talking about Sr 90, or Cs 137/135? What??
Yes. Do not forget Tritium. Nor Americium or plutonium or other Alpha-emitters.
There's lots of radiation at Fukushima. Drink up!
I'm sure it's good for you, like it's good for GE.
No, those are the "facts" fed to you by those sources you chose. I showed you independent sources. Abe and his government has instituted secrecy laws with draconian penalties, and do not allow negative reports to be issued regarding Fukushima.
Oh, so now you trust the guvmunt? Of Japan?
I'll take my experience with the GE Mark I BWR and my utility experience over your assertions.
Is it "too cheap to meter" yet?
Did you google Hanford and babies? Did you look up SL-1, Fermi I, and Monju? Chernobyl?
What do you know about nuclear processes and waste? Want to debate the issues and the specifics? I am hot to do it. Warning: I actually tested the BWR SRV components for the GE Mark I like in FukushimaTranslation: "I was a validation tech, meter-reader, and form filler-outer at a nuclear power plant and this qualifies me to know how they are designed and how they work. In addition I was an engineer without actually having an engineering education, degree or licence, which further qualifies me to spread anti-nuke propaganda written by hippies and tree-huggers with similar qualifications."
The fact is I have experience with this technology and you do not.
Here is a place to start:
http://en.wikiped...n_health
Jane Fonda? I guess she was a big deal to you civilians, but those of us in the war ignored all that, being a little busy at the time. Turns out she was right about all of that, huh?
I suggest they go stand on Unit Three, which was fueled with MOX.
Okay, we can take it down to one or two points: Read the reference on MOX you sent me, . . the whole thing. Now tell me why it is appropriate for us to work with that deadly stuff
More nonsense from outsiders. The view from the sidelines is not usually accurateGkam thinks he is an insider because he used the toilet in a nuclear plant. Or the equivalent. What, did you obtain your extensive knowledge by osmosis? You certainly didnt go to school for it like genuine experts.
You can blab about all the nuclear technologies you want, but should travel to Fukushima, and Chernobyl, and Hanford, and to WIPP first-All places YOUVE never been you fucking bullshitter.
You are getting your stuff from the folk who tell you what they want you to know-And youre getting your stuff from mother jones, and your ass.
I apologize for being so combative. I came back from the service with a lack of patience-And so much more. For instance you think others cant tell when youre bullshitting.
Yes, you can assume anything about me you find comforting: The fact is I have experience with this technology and you do notWe dont have to assume. We can read the lies you post and see you dont care whether they are obvious lies or not. Its enough for you to lie about your training and experience because youre so full of yourself that people are naturally going to believe you anyway, right?
Otto, I knew you could not debate the technology, so I opened your post with the foul language. Embarrassing, for a science site.Pros curse a lot. You would know this if you were one. Sometimes its the only way to accurately express their disgust.
Do you not understand you have revealed more about your own character than mine?
I knew you could not debate the technology
"I'd rather use thorium, but I see no issue working with MOX, . . ."
Then do it. Those who tried it are giving it up
The topic is Fukushima and the GE Mark I BWR, and the fact that events which were "impossible" occur relatively frequently, putting the entire world at riskNo the topic is whatever you choose to bullshit about. You chose to bullshit about your qualifications (you have none.) You chose to bullshit about thorium, which you know nothing about; easy to demonstrate.
But I was a Research EngineerYou were NEVER any fucking engineer you liar. Your job shop gave you a fancy title to make you feel good.
Did you see China Syndrome?
I guess you are unaware that movie contained actual events, all put together in that movie? The technical advisors were GE Nuclear engineers, who had the mockup of the control room and the events from reality.
Next, you are going to tell me there is no pool swell problem or hydraulic shock from SRV operation in BWRs. And Fukushima and Chernobyl are still operating cleanly.
All you have to do is look it up.
But I am sure that radiation is good for us!
http://new.atmc.j...9b07f31c
"One must be exposed to 100 millisieverts per year to have ANY increased risk of cancer...period."
---------------------------------------
Uh, . . no. They are not all alike. The 5.4 MeV particle from an Alpha emitter such as plutonium causes cancer in unprotected tissue. The particles they found over 160 km away were Plutonium, and there is no doubt many folk inhaled it. Look for a tsunami of cancers soon. BTW, look up the worldwide increases in thyroid cancer in kids.
"if you knew anything about biology (which is MY field), a single 5.4 MeV particle will not give you cancer."
------------------------------------
If biology is your field, then you know it is a numbers game. What does a 5.4 Million Electron Volt particle do to DNA?
At Raychem, we made heat-shrink plastics and wire insulation using 0.5 to 3.0 MeV electron beams. I promise you they are deleterious to living tissue.
Weasel words. We KNOW radiation causes cancer, and there is no question about it.
Looked into the rash of thyroid cancers?
MM, we have the numbers tied to exposure to radionuclides. I'll try to look it up. When working on the Industrial Hardening Manual, I kept up on these effects, but that was in 1979.
Is it "too cheap to meter" yet?
Otto screams: "You were NEVER any fucking engineer you liar. Your job shop gave you a fancy title to make you feel good. What a piece of shit you are."Gkam, unable to refute the arguments against him, makes up lies about his past because he thinks people will be impressed enough To ignore hiss lies about thorium, and plutonium raining down on Idaho.
---------------------------------------------
Unable to debate the topic, otto reveals his character.
When you find out I really did all those things while you drove your taxi, are you going to get nastier?I say again - NOBODY GIVES A SHIT. NOBODY GIVES A SHIT. Understand? Most people here have better qualifications than the ones you invent for yourself.
MM, The Hydrogen is generated not by the sea water, but the high-temperature reactions with the zirconium cladding and the steam when the rods are uncovered.
And the "damn thing" did melt down, and had eaten its way through meters of concrete and steel, and is now a few inches from the Earth.
The cores got uncovered, they started melting and undergoing steam-zirconium reactions generating hydrogen.
The water was already in the reactor vessel, in the cooling loop, too.
It did not require sea water for the meltdown and the H2.
fascination with my veracity will be rewarded eventually with an indentityNOBODY GIVES A SHIT.
Everybody's job is harder than it looks to outsiders, and I am sure otto's cab is not an easy driveEverybody here knows I am a retired professional with a real degree and a real licence. You on the other hand are none of those things.
denigrate him for not having a real job.Youre 70 years old. You havent worked in years. You crapped out as a 'consultant' because thats all you had left.
I think without the insertion of control rods, the core will overheat without water. In GE Mark I vessels, the rods must be inserted from below, using power. If the core is uncovered, it will melt down. Not a safe system.
molten materials drop to the bottom of the reactor vessel, they can and do assume conditions which can crate secondary fissions, secondary and uncontrolled crticalities.
All I see is a nasty man with a foul mouth, accusing others of what he would do in similar circumstances.Youve proven yourself to be a liar and a fraud. THAT is what is real.
I is real, otto
but we do not know about you, . . . except for your very unprofessional mouth.The people here know that WHO WE ARE has nothing to do with the FACTS we post. Only a self-centered moron would think otherwise.
Tell you what, . . we can identify ourselves, . . what'cha say?
" but it did happen in several places. It occurred at TMI II, and at all three Fukushima reactors. I guess it is not so remote after all.
otto, I knew you were too SCARED to do itYou mean like the gutless coward who offers to do it and then doesnt? The gutless coward who pretends to be someone he's not because hes afraid his arguments cant stand by themselves?
And did you ever have a mother? Who taught you to speak like an uneducated clown, with filthy words to cover the lack of knowledge?-says the ass who lies about his qualifications to cover up for his lack of knowledge.
And did you ever have a mother? Who taught you to speak like an uneducated clown, with filthy words to cover the lack of knowledge?
MM, I disagree with your notion of the cores being "solidified in a critical geometry". They were not solidified at all, but liquified by the 5,000 degree C events.
otto, I was looking up some GE BWR references to show what we worked on in the late 1970's. I only wrote the interim report, "Small-scale Quencher Screening Tests", but could only find others, and some references to the NASA reports we did on graphite materials and their dangersWHO GIVES A SHIT? Even if true it adds no weight to the crap you post. You were a validation tech. You were NEVER an engineer no matter what your job shop told you.
Maybe if you were not too scared to reveal your own experience, I could put my statements into language you understandOh sorry I dont speak bullshit.
But you have to stop this silly fascination with me personally, and look into the factors of which I warn you.Stop lying about your qualifications and experience and I'll be happy to.
see the only day you didn't post this year was Christmas, Otto. Mommy drag you to grandmas house again?-This from the infant whose biggest thrill is to show up to 1/5 me every day, of every week, of every month, for the last - what? - 3 years is it? My, time does fly when youre completely impotent doesnt it?
To learn more self-righteous potty mouthESTEVANS CHARACTER: "to fuck your mother Otto" "son of a dead smoking whore" "Otto leckt seiner toten Mutter rauchigen Geruch Genitalien"..."Why are you looking for pussy, darling? U KNOW you only love to suckee on me." "Have you quit fucking your dog yet?" "Ignorant bed-wetter"
You're a disgrace-says the apparent CEO of the only CNC shop in oregon that makes lower receivers for AR15s. With 48 employees. Says the guy who gave up debating me because he couldnt control his emotions and ended up exposing his family, his company, his customers, and his employees to scrutiny.
Good point. I was about to do so, to shut him up, but he would zero into some small item and make a big deal about his misrepresentation of itYeah and youre a liar, we've already established that. Give it to stumpy like you said.
Yes otto you're a disgraceOh I forgot - estivan pays little girls 5 cents to stalk otto and downrate him. And enjoys bragging about it.
experience, not Absolute Truth we are relatingIf that were true you wouldn't have to make up lies about your past would you? But you're only here to talk about yourself. Facts are optional.
Want more?None of thats relevant. Most is inflated. Have people here shown any interest whatsoever? Of course not.
When is the nuclear industry going to clean this up? The answer is, they can't.Where did you get the info on thorium being abandoned worldwide?
Yet, they keep on building more, enabled by the politicians they own.
Keep your eye on Georgia Power, which is building two AP1000 Nuclear Turkeys. It required US to guarantee the billions of dollars in loans to do it. So much for eliminating subsidies to loser technologies.I suppose this is how they might look to laymen and activist/hobbyists. But not to engineers and scientists who understand how they are designed and how they operate.
Those monsters are ridiculous: Look into their design. They think when they melt down, a big hat of water on them will "put it out"?? Do they not understand water is a moderator, letting the fast Neutrons slow down enough for capture and more fission?
How many nuclear "hobbyists" do you knowWell you for one. You talk like a hobbyist. For instance you start out with an incendiary question:
How did Plutonium get 130 km away from Fukushima?-and then proceed with a lot of unwarranted, unsubstantiated speculation. Did you look for an explanation from experts? No. Would you have understood it if you did? No. Because you're not trained to do so.
Gosh, otto,if you are not trying to disparage my character, it appears you have nothing to say.I read the wiki page. Did you read my quotes? Many countries are pursuing this. It's far from being abandoned as you said.
Want the references to the Plutonium? The German trials with Thorium? References to the Georgia Vogtle plants? References to what? Tell me,. so we can get it straight.
Don't run away!
" For starters, reference the vessel parts being 130km away from the explosion."Sorry, a single '2μm diameter particle' is dust, not a 'part'. 'Parts' implies an explosion capable of throwing macroscopic objects that far. Something entirely different, as any expert would tell you. Dust is carried by prevailing winds. 'Parts' is no doubt a translation error from the original Japanese.
----------------------------------------------------
http://fukushima-...rconium/
I have others, if you wish to read them.
If you want to actually discuss these technologies and what I learned from all those years, we can do that, but not personal attacksYou didn't 'learn' them. Learning them is going to school, studying, taking tests, earning a degree, and gaining experience as a professional.
http://http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/iss/highlights/highlight-ag1/index.htmlRight. Nothing in there about 'parts'. Let's discuss why you don't know the difference between dust and parts, or why you would read '2μm diameter particle' and not think dust.
"Airborne Plutonium and Non-Natural Uranium from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Found at 120 km Distance a Few Days after Reactor Hydrogen Explosions"
Go to some of the offers I made many posts above above, and let's discuss them.
Toots, I was a communications tech, as I said. I was in certain places doing things I was assigned to do, and learned what I related to you. Apparently, you do not even read my posts.Irrelevant. Nobody cares. I saw somebody throw an egg at the president. Does that mean he knows anything about politics?
Wait until I tell you how I got to personally and professionally piss off Chuck Yeager.
Here is the download link for the report.Theres nothing in there about parts being blasted 120km from the site. Answer the question; why don't you know the difference between dust and parts?
http://www.helmho...961w.pdf
YES, otto, those bits were part of Unit Three, fueled with MOX, spiked with Plutonium.Well that's what parts means isn't it? Shards, slivers, shrapnel.
What did you expect, cams and gears?
Those particles were RESPIRABLE!OMG! Irrelevant. No massive explosion capable of hurling PARTS for 120km. Which is what you were selling before I corrected you.
"OMG! Irrelevant."True. So why did you lie about the parts flying through the air for 120km? Did you think people wouldnt check?
----------------
No, otto, most relevant. A camshaft is big enough to see and have picked up, while the particle is small enough to lodge in the lung, without the protection of the outer epidermis. That big 5.4 MeV emitter can only really hurt us from the inside.
otto,you are making things up, not understanding the important factors in radiation protection.
When is the nuclear industry going to clean this up? The answer is, they can't.
Yet, they keep on building more, enabled by the politicians they own.
otto thinks "part" of the fuel rods means an engine block, I guess. Sorry otto, it was only Plutonium. And did you look up the 2.5 limits in air pollution?Gkam thinks throwing random facts around will make him look knowledgable. But when he says
How did Plutonium get 130 km away from Fukushima? It included parts of reactor vessel-we know he's not very much so. 'Only plutonium' -? Do you think reactor vessels are made of plutonium??
Do you know the differences betweenI know where to look them up as do you. And I know the difference between 'parts' and dust. You should have looked that one up.
Come on, otto, you have insufficient educationWell I admit that freely. Admit that you have NO formal education in nuclear-related fields.
So you accuse me of having your character.Admit that you read the article you referenced about parts flying 120km away, and didn't realize it was fallout. Come on, be a man.
Pu was calculated as (130±21) nBq/m3
And MM thinks all disintegrations are the same, no Gamma, Beta or Alpha factors need be weighed. You folk are SO eager to take shots, you blow your own "theories". Go to a reputable nuclear site, not affiliated with the industry.
I suggest a vacation in Fukushima, so they can see for themselves what happens with this technology they seem to love at a distance.
If you say no, I will give you the references you cannot ignore.
14.658�ĽSv/h is the current reading. Want to live there?
If I show you the Corium has eaten its way through the steel-reinforced concrete and is now only inches from the Earth and the Water Table, will you be concerned?
Can any of you technical experts tell me about reactor types and their history? Let's get it on!
Well, I am sure glad you outsiders are so convinced about the safety of nuclear technology, never having worked with it, or even seen one up close. And those areas are so safe, they are being filled up with people right now, . . . oh, . . they're not?
Can I send you photos of Chernobyl children? Look up those words, and be embarrassed.
Yes. Let's get it on!
Alpha, Beta, and Gamma are NOT alike.
We will not solve anything here but education. You will get it.
Your assertion of Bequerels assumes they are all alike. They are not.
They are trying to assume it is all okay, when they can still get deadly doses if they stand in the wrong place.
MM, you are the Jehovah's Witness, falling for silly stuff told to you by those with axes to grind, . . BIG MONEY axes. Go behind the altar and see what they really do.
Safety? Are you kidding? We have hundreds of square miles of land uninhabitable near Prypiat.
Do you really think you can survive living in Fukushima?
How many cancers will be started this year by wind turbines?
"Science" in the Daily Mail, . . a political rag?
Go look into gold mining and extraction. Then, look into resource substitution, and pollution controls. Large generators do not use rare earths for magnets, they use exciters. Look up how it works.
You are taking shots in a field you do not understand.
If it is all so simple, why do we still have three to five million gallons of the deadliest material on Earth eating its way through the newest set of tanks at Hanford?
Hanford babies.
Can you really show me one successful storage site? I want to see the technology.
" . . . and the Fairies will carry away the rest!"
MM, I want your references to the background radiation levels, please.
More than 1500 people died during or as a direct result of the evacuation at Fukushima according to the NEI. Nuclear apologists always claim that had nothing to do with Nuclear energy, that its the bureacracy [sic] that really killed them for having to have an evacuation plan in the first place. The brainwashing is complete. Or they work for the nuclear industry in some capacity..
MM, are you otto in disguise? You are sounding like him.
Meanwhile, why did they evacuate the area, and why can't they come back? Why is everyone wearing complete body suits and respirators?
And why are we using this dangerous technology?
Tell you what, clean up Fukushima so we cannot tell what happened, tell us what you did with the intensely-radioactive waste, and we may let you build another one.
The background radiation at my house is just under 0.1 microSievert/hr. The readings at Fuku are over 14.5 microSieverts/hr. At 14.0 that gives you 122,640 microSieierts/year.
Show me one worker at Fukushima who is not in full protective dress, including respirator.
you outsiders are so convinced about the safety of nuclear technology, never having worked with it, or even seen one up closeThe osmosis argument again. Most people who drive cars dont have the slightest idea how they work. And you have no idea what youre talking about.
Go look up the design of the system, go to the videos of the system and see for yourself. You do not even understand the design of the systemProvide links to back up your empty innuendo.
Show me one worker at Fukushima who is not in full protective dress, including respiratorWell thats easy.
122,640 microSieierts equals 122.6 milliSieverts, which is 1.22%. How many folk in the Northern Hemisphere? Run the numbers, Toots.
The 1500+ deaths directly attributed to the evacuation are from NEI, the Nuclear Energy Institute, as clearly stated. You might be able to read but you have little understanding of facts. Nearly 1/5th of a million people had to be evacuated and 80,000 are still homeless. This means nothing to an apologist. And of course, radiation deaths show up years later, so you are being disingenuous to say the least. But you know that.
The issue of the radioactive water, 400 more tons each day, has been answered by a TEPCO bureaucrat, who will just dump it into the ocean.
Show me one worker at Fukushima who is not in full protective dress, including respirator.Show me one bullshit pronouncement by the phoney expert engineer gkam that can't be discredited in a few minutes. You harm your cause by attempting to argue it in public.
At first, they lied about the meltdowns at TMI, not admitting it for YEARS, when we knew within hours. But you folk just continue to trust them like you did with "WMD!".
The design is unsafe, . . . . and you can just wait for Indian Point to happen
Does that record include Fukushima?
What will you do with the intensely-radioactive waste? No pies in the sky, you had over 50 years to find a way, and cannot do it.
Thanks for bringing that up. Then, what is the reason for the cemeteries of babies over the decades? Why are babies being born now with partial brains?
"We've found a way to do it. You just refuse to let facts confuse you."
----------------------------------------
Show me. No pie in the sky, I want to see the working facility and the technology. This concerns the industry which promised us "Too cheap to meter" and "Meltdowns are impossible".
Right now, you folk cannot even STORE it safely, it seems.
All you folk hiding away from Fukushima can come back now!
Attention: Displaced People! It is all safe now, according to MM, so all those workers can take off their respirators and suits!
Buy cheap land in a lovely forest. This land, just outside of Pripyat, is ideal for a new family. Lots of Nature, and few people!
Gonna have some bargains out there, . . .
You forgot the sky fairies and the bridge trolls. They all exist together in Fantasyland.
What really gets you is the fact she was right about the war and about nuclear power.
She was right about the war, and utterly traitorous in how she went about protesting it. She gave notes passed to her from navy pilots to their NVA captors....let that sink in...ok, i gotta weigh in on this one
I'd have her in prison still.
Hey, otto, I was Senior Engineer of what was then the largest non-governmental power company on earthNo you werent. You were a job shopper with an inflated title.
Show me I wasn'tYoure not an engineer by your own admission and you do not have the right to use inflated titles in order to claim to be one.
Show me I wasn't a communications tech at the Air Force Flight Test Center, and AFFTC Airman of the Month for October, 1966.Show me what being a technician has to do with anything in this thread? Or any thread youve participated in?
Why don't you ask about specifics, things you can checkI DID. Why would any engineer mistake dust for reactor parts? Why would any engineer think that an H2 explosion could hurl reactor parts 120km?
jane fonda is a traitor and a piece of scumThe way to end a conflict is to annihilate the enemy. In order to annihilate the enemy you have to convince them to come out of the shadows and fight. In order to do this you have to give them the idea that they can win.
We won that war with the help of jane fonda.@Ghost
You should be happy to have an explanation which gives meaning to all the effort expended.@Ghost
You should see in it hope that troubles in the middle east will be resolved in the same way - by the gradual destruction of the medieval cultures which cause them.we may see eye to eye a little on the eventual outcome and the future of the middle east ...
you have to convince them to come out of the shadows and fight. In order to do this you have to give them the idea that they can win.... So during tet they obediently threw themselves on the wire and were killed in great pilesbut they had been building up for the Tet for a while
So during tet they obediently threw themselves on the wire and were killed in great piles@Ghost
Jane fonda was enlisted to go over to vietnam and do exactly this
i would prefer to have some evidenceWell there wouldn't be any evidence whatsoever for that sort of thing would there? We have to rely on inference. Forensics. We have a better perspective now on the war than we did when we formed our opinions back in the 70s. Back then we didn't anticipate the outcome that we see now. We can look at the outcome and wonder if the war hadn't been fought to produce it, and that there was no other way to produce it, than by fighting that war in exactly the way it was fought.
I do not trust nuclear technologies and their supporters because I know better - from experience.
Okay, how many died because of Chernobyl? How many are killed each year by operating wind turbines? Photovoltaic operation?
How many died at Chernobyl?
How many were killed by SL-1? If it is so safe, why did they have to bury parts of the bodies from SL-1 as High-level waste?
Where are you going to put the intensely-radioactive waste? No pie-in-the-sky promises, I want to see the technology at work. No more lies and promises.
"It's your assertion they aren't safe. Provide your source. I've provided mine in spades. Quit bleating like a sheep and pony up."
------------------------------------------------------
http://ecowatch.c...kushima/
I am not going to change your mind, MM. That's fine.
We will see which technology bedevils us the most, . . won't we?
No, MM, any data I provide will just send you to some nuclear industry site for rebuttal.
I think I am the only one here with any kind of experience with the technology, as sketchy as it is. All you "know" is what they tell you. Get fooled before? Recently?
Sorry to get personal, . . got carried away.
We will see, . . . . about nuclear technologies, which need police states to guard.
Yes, and what else did they tell you? That meltdowns were impossible?
Radiation does NOT go away.
No. Look up the waste from the process. All these folk are doing is taking the remaining fuel out of the waste, not converting it to safe materials. They are creating more actinides to bedevil Mankind essentially forever, in Human terms.
The actinides poison the reactions, making it impossible to use all the active fuel, so it is "reprocessed" to get the remaining fissile stuff, so they can create MORE actinide waste.
Show me the place in the fuel cycle where the radiation goes away.
Then, where does it go?
It is not "used up" as you seem to actually believe!
But stop the ridiculous and outright silly held to account nonsense.
But stop the ridiculous and outright silly held to account nonsense.
Absolutely not...you WILL be held to account, I'm done with you and your ilk. if our government deems you insignificant so be it. If not, be prepared for your positions publicly displayed for prosecution. I'm done with the likes of you on a civil level....
Well there wouldn't be any evidence whatsoever for that sort of thing would there? We have to rely on inference. Forensics.@Ghost
Stumpy, "Area 51", or Groom Lake as it is really known@Gkam
Wow, Stumpy, our firefighters and medics were busy at Eddie's. Glad I did not have that job. I saw enough as it was, no need for close-up stuff.@Gkam
Stumpy, you would have loved the XB-70. Almost as fast as the Blackbird, but no leaks, and it was pure white, . . and big. I'll email you some stuff about itWhy would he want info from a comtech when he could get real info, written by real experts, on the web?
experienceGkam thinks that experience is taking a dump in a restroom at a nuke plant, or losing a job every 6 mos and then imagining all the wonderful things he did.
EvidenceStumpy says that 1) he worked for the govt and 2) he's seen lots of evidence, and so he feels qualified to assert that there must be evidence for everything. You're starting to sound like gkam.
Stumpy says that 1) he worked for the govt and 2) he's seen lots of evidence, and so he feels qualified to assert that there must be evidence for everything. You're starting to sound like gkam.@Ghost
Most of the evidence for MKultra was destroyed by the outgoing CIA director. Criminals destroy evidence. But we can examine the most significant results of wars and revolutions forensically and begin to infer intent.
destroyed by the outgoing CIA director.@Ghost
No, otto, I think a prompt moderated criticality can cast fuel rod residue of the reactor over 130 km. How about you?But above gkam said this:
How did Plutonium get 130 km away from Fukushima? It included parts of reactor vessel and the fuel components-Sadly, others have noted that he is a pathological liar as well.
"-Sadly, others have noted that he is a pathological liar as well."I have the sort of character which cannot tolerate lies and pretense. Your experience is as a low level tech, form filler-outer, powerpoint jockey, and chronic unemployed. I suppose you imagine these are something to dream about?
-------------------------------------------
You dream of me, don't you otto?
Admit it. You are fixated on my experiences because you have none. Why else avoid the topic and demonstrate your character?
Where did you get your ideas about nam? All wars look the same while you're standing in the middle of them.@Ghost
Henry Fonda taught you that ww2 was the good war.@Otto
I am so sorry they did not find that V-8 engine block you assumed they would find when I said reactor "part". You depend on semantics because you do not understand the technologyIm so sorry you thought you had to post rubbish and then you had to lie about posting it, because you're not man enough to admit you made a mistake. But I would expect this from someone who has to lie about his qualifications.
Otto, I had the guts to put myself out there and you are still hiding, but sniping those you cannot equal in a fair discussion. Now, let's hear you tell us where the Corium is and its condition.No, you lacked the guts to post without making up a false personal history to impress people.
turner didn't have an effect on meYoure missing the point - the media gives us our opinions. You only read the books which got published.
No, otto, what I said was true. You just assume I have your character. Maybe we will have to wait until you find out others may be better than you, or have more experience in matters.The topic is not you or all the imaginary wonderful things youve done.
Or maybe you already know and it is the reason for your attitude. At any rate, let's keep to the topic
If you do not believe my experience, too bad. You should use it to learn, instead of ego-bumping.I believe when you say you have no training, no degree, and no licence as an engineer. I believe that despite this you cant help but pretend to be one in order to impress people and boost your stunted ego.
Youre missing the point - the media gives us our opinions. You only read the books which got published.@Otto
The topic here is Fukushima, not guns or anything else. Let's do the guns thing in another forum.@gkam
Didn't mean to interrupt your conversations, I just thought if we got into that, this thread would never end.Uh who gives a shit what you want?
I'd like to have that discussion, but elsewhere, when it is time.
Counsel of Foreign Relations controls media in USA, Captain@kochevnik
Didn't mean to interrupt your conversations, I just thought if we got into that, this thread would never end.@gkam
I'd like to have that discussion, but elsewhere, when it is time.
Counsel of Foreign Relations controls media in USA, Captain
ShotmanMaslo
Dec 21, 2014Waste should be put deep underground where it is safe at least for centuries, until it can be burned in breeders or humanity goes extinct and it wont matter anymore.