physorg - What????


Co-financed by the FOM Foundation and in cooperation entity. 'Incidentally, the three-metre distance between the electrons was chosen quite arbitrarily. We could conduct this experiment over much larger distances', Hanson adds.with the British firm Element Six, Hanson and his colleagues succeeded in bringing two electrons in different diamonds, situated at several metres' distance from each other, into an entangled state.

…. To prove the resulting entanglement, the spin orientation of both electrons was read out and compared. Although the spin orientation of each electron individually was completely random, exactly as predicted by quantum mechanics, the researchers found that the two orientations were always exactly opposite to each other. This proves that the two electrons are entangled and behave as a single entity. 'Incidentally, the three-metre distance between the electrons was chosen quite arbitrarily. We could conduct this experiment over much larger distances', Hanson adds.

This seems to be another proves for quantum entanglement which based on simple algebra of Bell concept, anyway in quantum mechanics system, mathematic involved is more complicate vector concept! Here we could show that actually it based on Einstein hidden variable…
http://www.vacuum...19〈=en

This seems to be another proves for quantum entanglement which based on simple algebra of Bell concept, anyway in quantum mechanics system, mathematic involved is more complicate vector concept! Here we could show that actually it based on Einstein hidden variable…


Entanglement is an observational result, and not one specifically of theory. In other words, no matter what the proposed theory is, it must accept the rejection of local hidden variables. This is what the Bell theorem prooved.

Quantum mechanics is one of the most important theories in modern physics, despite of their predictability and accuracy; it is facing with crucial philosophic problems. Indeed the problems could be solved, and the theory could be improved by using "Vacuum Mechanics" - from "vacuum mechanics link


The philosophical problems inherent in QM, which are significant, should not be solved via physical theory**,... but instead, as a realization that for epistemological reasons, 'objective realism', must be rejected.

** the Broglie-Bohm attempt at this with Non-local hidden variables, was redundant and pointless as it still had to propose unobservable metaphysical wave 'things'. As pointless as proposing an aether. Just accept logical posivism and that QM is 'complete' to the extent of making predictions, and that that is the only meaning to be attributed to science.