I really wish the videos had been better by:

a.) Getting a photographer who knows what he is doing.
b.) Video in higher resolution
c.) Narration by someone who can project his voice instead of muttering to himself.

Otherwise, the technology is very interesting, just wish I could have seen it.

Okay, so this is not something like the Nintendo 3DS that also can make and receive calls. Any angle viewing would be an exciting advancement in 3D glasses-less technology. But before reading the article, the article's title had me going "yeah so?"

This is not true 3d display, because the image is "burned" into it, not something like Nintendo 3DS.

I think the crappy resolution of the video is just to blur out the fact that the 3D display itself had a crappy resolution.

The technology seems interesting, though, but like all the other 3D technologies, it will never become The One to use in all situations.

This technology has to use preposterous amounts of bandwidth, both for transmission and for display. Using this technology, it would take an actual supercomputer merely to show a feature film to a theater audience. (And an insanely expensive display screen, too.)

A Nintendo type one-person two-eyes display only needs double the resources of a 2D display.

But, this thing has its uses, too. I think we will see about a dozen technologies that will be used for a long time, because each excels at different things. And 2D movies and TV shows will not go away either. There simply are too many situations where you'd actually prefer an honest 2D viewing experience.