It sort of puzzles me how a proton-muon atom can be compared physically to a normal atom of hydrogen, and the spectral frequency of emitted photons compared. Obviously I expect the investigators have dealt with the question, but isn't the absorbtion or emission spectrum of an atom determined by the various full or half wavelength orbit pathlengths (sic) possible of the outer orbital electron(s) of an atom before it is entirely ionized off? And normal hydrogen has only 4 possible orbit changes for an electron, from 420 nm to about 600 nm. So my problem is, with the muon being 20x heavier than the electron, it's wavelength must be much longer than the electron, yet it apparently orbits much closer to the proton (eg. much shorter orbits). ?? I'd like to see the emission or absorbtion lines they are detecting, or at least a statement of the wavelengths.
Very concise description of the researchers process. However, I saw no reference to the neutron half of the nucleus. It seems to me that a measurement of that might provide some potentially interesting correlations.
did the muon's additional mass merely confirm the measurement of the protons "size" or did IT cause the proton charge (Field) to shrink?
There's no neutron in regular hydrogen.
You can use them ALL your fake accounts to give me as many stars as you can! Thank you oh thank you oh...!! not...
In the meantime, in real life: "How Wineland & Haroche Stole My Discovery (and got 2012 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE for it...)":
http://sites.goog...ci#Nobel
In the meantime, in real life: "How Wineland & Haroche Stole My Discovery (and got 2012 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE for it...)"
Oh look, a Wineland and Haroche type of "research"! They can't mint enough medals for them all ingeniahs westernahs...
God knows what hungered Chinese grad student they stole this discovery from... Scum like Edison, Marconi, Bell... Today from Asians and eastern Europeans, as yesterday from Tesla, Meucci and countless others...
You can use them ALL your fake accounts to give me as many stars as you can! Thank you oh thank you oh...!! not...
In the meantime, in real life: "How Wineland & Haroche Stole My Discovery (and got 2012 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE for it...)":
http://sites.goog...ci#Nobel
: Are you related to a guy named Zephyr?Negative. I don't think, the aether model will be stolen soon with some nobelist.
: Are you related to a guy named Zephyr?Negative. I don't think, the aether model will be stolen soon with some nobelist.
In spite of two findings from Einstein and Planck, one to show the equation between atoms and energy and the other to discover the constant between waves' frequencies and energy, traditional science has never closed the circle.
The repercussions of Wavevolution are huge and overturn many common beliefs but, the bureaucracy of traditional science prevents the recognition of any event unless certain criteria are first met.
The repercussions of wavevolution are huge and overturn many common beliefs but, the bureaucracy of traditional science prevents the recognitionIt has nothing to do with the above subject anyway. This problem is quantitative, it consists of nearly two dozens of QED corrections already and only quantitative theory could help with it.
Shootist
Jan 24, 2013Yes. We call "closing the barn door". It makes everything so much easier.