It's based on the idea that shortly after the Big Band,
Nothing important to contribute here, just laughed at how musical the universe must be, to have been created by a Big Band.
It's based on the idea that shortly after the Big Band,
Nothing important to contribute here, just laughed at how musical the universe must be, to have been created by a Big Band.
It's based on the idea that shortly after the Big Band,
Nothing important to contribute here, just laughed at how musical the universe must be, to have been created by a Big Band.
Stable topological defects of light (pseudo)scalar fields can contribute to the Universe's dark energy and dark matter. Currently, the combination of gravitational and cosmological constraints provides the best limits on such a possibility. We take an example of domain walls generated by an axionlike field with a coupling to the spins of standard-model particles and show that, if the galactic environment contains a network of such walls, terrestrial experiments aimed at the detection of wall-crossing events are realistic….
The idea is interesting. However it seems quite unlikely that we'd cross a domain wall within the timeframe of such an experiment (or they are a lot more abundant than I've last read)Jeez I don't know - an international team of physics researchers thinks it is perhaps likely, as they describe in their paper published in Physical Review Letters, so maybe they know something you don't?
The real scientists are grasping at straws. The cosmic walls idea is a structural hypothesis without offering much insight, if any, into the mysteries of Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
And of course when real scientists are grasping at straws, the cranks come out of the woodwork to 'explain' their certainties.
Why do so many cranks - people who both are certain they know the answers and despise peer review - hang around a non-crank site? There's a mystery nearly as profound as DM and DE.
Oh look, another bs "theory" worked out upside-down.
The only funnier thing on this site than promoting fairy tales is the "rating system" for comments. You can give little stars to posters. (S)he loves me, (s)he loves me not... Then if someone rates my post highly, should I return the favor? Mimicking the buddy system aka "peer review"... Truly a sociological phenomenon of the gorillas herd type. Here's a big banana for a big banana.
But what a sicko you have to be to make a grading system for even them comments. It's lab Nazi control-freaks at their best: thinking science is about democracy, when it isn't. Worse yet, they indoctrinate kids into it.
In the meantime, on planet Earth: "How Wineland & Haroche Stole My Discovery (and got 2012 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE for it...)" https://sites.goo...ci#Nobel
The idea is interesting. However it seems quite unlikely that we'd cross a domain wall within the timeframe of such an experiment (or they are a lot more abundant than I've last read)
As I understand it, the structure of the Universe in this theory leaves matter concentrated along the domain wall intersections.
Proper science should start with observations and then propose theories that fit the data.
Oh look, another bs "theory" worked out upside-down.
The only funnier thing on this site than promoting fairy tales is the "rating system" for comments. You can give little stars to posters. (S)he loves me, (s)he loves me not... Mimicking the buddy system aka "peer review"... Truly a sociological phenomenon of the gorillas herd type. Here's a big banana for a big banana.
But what a sicko you have to be to make a grading system for even them comments. It's lab Nazi control-freaks at their best: thinking science is about democracy, when it isn't. Worse yet, they indoctrinate kids into it.
In the meantime, on planet Earth: "How Wineland & Haroche Stole My Discovery (and got 2012 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE for it...)" https://sites.goo...ci#Nobel
You are, without a doubt, the biggest whack job of all.
Proper science should start with observations and then propose theories that fit the data.
Well, as DM is an observation I'd think the experiment would fit the bill. In any case: it's a cheap experiment to set up - so why not run it.
@Benni: Entropy is a process in all systems, also non-isolated, by statistical physics. On the scale of cosmologies, FRW universes behaves as systems with exact zero energy, i.e. closed. This is explicit under inflation and the far future, as in both cases expansion is adiabatic (no energy exchange).
@Benni: Entropy is a process in all systems, also non-isolated, by statistical physics. On the scale of cosmologies, FRW universes behaves as systems with exact zero energy, i.e. closed. This is explicit under inflation and the far future, as in both cases expansion is adiabatic (no energy exchange).
You need to undertake some courses in Thermodynamics, take a final exam, and get a passing grade. I've done all this which is why I understand "entropy" & you obviously do not as evidenced your haphazard paraphrasing of the language of my profession.
You need to undertake some courses in Thermodynamics, take a final exam, and get a passing grade. I've done all this which is why I understand "entropy" & you obviously do not as evidenced your haphazard paraphrasing of the language of my profession.
And you should have taken one or two courses in addition to thermodynamics. Rudimentary mechanics would tell you that he it entirely correct, and you are not thinking beyond very basic heat transfer.
brt
Jan 21, 2013