Why don't they just add a second tier article section, like the comments tab, where additional authors can make contributions?
"letting people claim that Canada is south of the US can't be tolerated, even when the person believes it to be true (and they do"
I agree that there are too many "deletionists" on Wikipedia. They bug me. It's like they think there isn't room on Wikipedia for minor articles.
I don't have the required time to do too many searches, but someone who stays home instead of going out to work might have the patience and lots of time on his/her hands.-And so you check buzzle, or you do absolutely no research whatsoever. Because you are lazy.
Well said Otto. I'd also like to point out the inherent prejudice that oozes from most of his statements. In this one, someone must be unemployed and study all day to not flood this site with every pea-brained idea that comes to mind.Naw its the ignorance also.
Like Otto said, it's not your ignorance that bothers us, it's your laziness.
Otto, you are talking with you sockpuppet! Shall you use this as "indisputable evidence" that you are two different people?Naw thats pretty obvious to most anybody but dimwits and scummy trolls. Which one are you? Or maybe you are both?
I am soooo surprised that you agree with yourself.
Must be on your meds.
kathologist
Jan 4, 2013wikipediocracy.org -
They have opened the forum to the public this week.
Several folks have been working diligently to aggregate info and write articles about the world of Wikipedia/Wikimedia/Commons and the Foundation.