The research also highlights a major problem for evolution: How could the soft -bodied organism remain unchanged for 200m years? Did no more evolution take place in that species? Just when does evolution supposedly come to a halt in any group?
This is a major headache for the evolutionary paradigm.
The research also highlights a major problem for evolution: How could the soft -bodied organism remain unchanged for 200m years? Did no more evolution take place in that species? Just when does evolution supposedly come to a halt in any group?
This is a major headache for the evolutionary paradigm.
The Earth isn't 6000 years old, no matter what you say, kevin. Do your job, mods.
The Earth isn't 6000 years old, no matter what you say, kevin. Do your job, mods.
Science should be an open discussion based on the facts. The fact here and in a lot of cases, is that no evolution has occurred. This fact goes against the general evolutionary theory that species will change over time. 200 million years is a long time for no changes to appear, perhaps the theory falls short here? That is all Kevin is saying.
Please please please keep an open mind and not assume everyone who questions the theory thinks the earth is 6,000 years old. Assuming this invokes the 'straw man' defense and is a weak escape from honest debate.
I believe what Kevin posted is a valid scientific argument and should not be thrown out because to do so would unscientific in itself.
kevinrtrs
Dec 4, 2012This is a major headache for the evolutionary paradigm.