Why not a picture of a sea butterfly?

When we're bombarded with bullsh*t studies like this one: http://phys.org/n...ada.html

how can any climate change study be trusted?

When they deny every bit of evidence, even the weather changing around them

how can an climate change denier be trusted?

ScooTard doesn't believe in bark beetles. They just don't exist in his political reality.

Meanwhile... Here on Planet Reality...

Here is a massive forest destroyed by them.

http://ourchildre...g_0.jpeg

Global Warming Doubles Bark Beetle Mating and Increases Attacks 60-Fold

http://ourchildre...-60-fold

When we're bombarded with bullsh*t studies like this one: http://phys.org/n...ada.html
how can any climate change study be trusted?

Your comment on the pine beetle story was pure assertion, without evidence or argument. You repeat the assertion, again without evidence or argument. Why should your assertion be trusted?

Aren't you one of the people who claim that climate is too complex and the models are inadequate? Ocean acidification is simple chemistry, the effects can be studied. Here you have evidence of one of the effects of acidification that can be predicted from basic chemistry. If your instinctive denial of that simple relationship can't be trusted, how can your denial of more complex relationships be trusted?