When we're bombarded with bullsh*t studies like this one: http://phys.org/n...ada.html how can any climate change study be trusted?
Your comment on the pine beetle story was pure assertion, without evidence or argument. You repeat the assertion, again without evidence or argument. Why should your assertion be trusted?
Aren't you one of the people who claim that climate is too complex and the models are inadequate? Ocean acidification is simple chemistry, the effects can be studied. Here you have evidence of one of the effects of acidification that can be predicted from basic chemistry. If your instinctive denial of that simple relationship can't be trusted, how can your denial of more complex relationships be trusted?
NOM
Nov 25, 2012