One-time pads have been used for a long time for very important messages. If the above code is written using one then there's no way to break it.There are ways to break codes using one-time pads as described in the book Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephensen. I read it on recommendation of this woman:
There are ways to break codes using one-time pads as described in the book Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephensen.
In any case a message that could be encrypted in 135 letters would be succinct, but could be long enough to have great importance.It may be padded to a predefined length. Any one-time pad can be used only once (obviously). There is no reason not to encrypt to maximum length each time (when using pigeons) and deprive listeners this 'channel' of distingusihing importance by length.
The only explanation is that liberal schools have dumbed down the world to a point that no one can solve a simple cryptoquote.
Must not have been "too" important, because it didn't reach it's destination and nobody seems to have missed it.
We used to break VC codes like this all the time in Viet Nam. The only explanation is that liberal schools have dumbed down the world to a point that no one can solve a simple cryptoquote.
The coded message may have revealed Nazi sympathizers within the English government and even the Royal family, whose ancestry is German.What you mean the norman invasion? Or the The House of Hanover, a German royal dynasty which has ruled the Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg (German: Braunschweig-Lüneburg), the Kingdom of Hanover, the Kingdom of Great Britain, the Kingdom of Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It succeeded the House of Stuart as monarchs of Great Britain and Ireland in 1714 and held that office until the death of Queen Victoria in 1901...?
Since the Communists are still there, your code-breaking skills were nothing to brag about.ALSO, from the way events unfolded in southeast asia we can conclude that the US never intended to defeat communism. The main Purpose of that war was to destroy the incipient religionist cultures which had always resulted in overgrowth and conflict. This required the combined efforts of BOTH western and communist forces over the course of many generations.
Since the Communists are still there, your code-breaking skills were nothing to brag about.ALSO, from the way events unfolded in southeast asia we can conclude that the US never intended to defeat communism. The main Purpose of that war was to destroy the incipient religionist cultures which had always resulted in overgrowth and conflict. This required the combined efforts of BOTH western and communist forces over the course of many generations.
The proof is that today vietnam is a prosperous and productive member of the world community. This is Victory by any measure.
We used to break VC codes like this all the time in Viet Nam. The only explanation is that liberal schools have dumbed down the world to a point that no one can solve a simple cryptoquote.Okay, game on. How long until you break THIS message?
Must not have been "too" important, because it didn't reach it's destination and nobody seems to have missed it.Who knows? Might have shortened the war by six months, as in "Hitler is sleeping HERE tonight". Or not.
The "Golden Triangle" of poppy fields was the true focus of Western interests in the region, not some flimsy pretext like keeping Communism in check or cockamamie religious cleansing. It was about MONEY! Afganistan has some poppy fields that our troops guard presently.The history of the Progress of this civilization is a record of the destruction of cultures which would impede this Progress. Drugs were used to destroy Chinese culture during the opium wars. Drugs were used to assist in the destruction of the pre-ww2 religionist cultures in the west.
We used to break VC codes like this all the time in Viet Nam. The only explanation is that liberal schools have dumbed down the world to a point that no one can solve a simple cryptoquote.
We used to break VC codes like this all the time in Viet Nam. The only explanation is that liberal schools have dumbed down the world to a point that no one can solve a simple cryptoquote.So sport, so why haven't conservative schools jumped in to save the day and show how superior they are?
We used to break VC codes like this all the time in Viet Nam. The only explanation is that liberal schools have dumbed down the world to a point that no one can solve a simple cryptoquote.
Couldn't it be a set of keys to codes rather than a coded message itself?@Sean: No. Keys are guarded like gold. No way would anyone tie one onto the the leg of a pigeon and toss it on the air. And what need would there be to do this anyway? Remember, the pigeons aren't flying to units in the field--they are flying back to their homes, presumably in England.
Well, they lost vietnam to an infinitely 'inferior' foe (at least in terms of materiel and money) - how 'superior' do you think they really are?Nothing inferior about the surviving religions which have perfected the art of outgrowing and overrunning their neighbors. They've had 10k years to evolve. Democracy is an infant by comparison.
Some obvious things: 27 is the number of code blocks. It begins and ends with the same sequence. There, see, I've solved it. ;P
Well, they lost vietnam to an infinitely 'inferior' foe (at least in terms of materiel and money) - how 'superior' do you think they really are?
The U.S. today seems to lean so heavily towards protecting "civilians" that our military never seems to accomplish practical objectives. For example, we never "actually" defeated Al Qaeda, after all, they ARE civilians. They are the guy down the street, looks, dresses normally.The reason we can't defeat al quaida is because it has an unending source of raw material to call upon, generated by you religionists. People are forced to bear more children than they can support, these children grow up hungry and angry, and their religion tells them exactly whose fault that is. Read your holy book for explicit instructions on how to make this happen.
The reason we can't defeat al quaida is because it has an unending source of raw material to call upon, generated by you religionists.
People are forced to bear more children than they can support
These children grow up hungry and angry, and their religion tells them exactly whose fault that is.
1, You've been reported for correlating me with al qaeda.No I said al quaida
2, You're clearly blaming everyone who believes in God for terrorism even when they have absolutely nothing in common with their doctrines or theology.No actually they have everything of practical importance in common. Name one thing your religion promises that any other religion does not promise.
Maybe you need an education so you can be capable of distinguishing completely opposite beliefs and teachings from one another.Your religion promises, in return for unconditional devotion:
I'm aware of no such thing happening at any time in the western worldWomen in your religion (whatever it may be) were traditionally restricted to the sole activity of MAKING and RAISING BABIES. This was ALWAYS the case in the western world. This is overgrowth by FORCE.
I don't know what the Koran says about child rearing and finances (probably something twisted, I'm sure,) but the Bible says blahIt also says:
...but the Bible says blahAnd if you are one of those custom godders who think jesus came to earth to make righteous Lawbreakers of you all, the NT says:
nobody is supposed to have more children than they can reasonably support. To do so is unbiblicalGod led 2M out into the desert to wander for 40 years with no means of support. But god promised to deliver and lo, he sent manna by the ton.
I find this strange how so many people seem to know that it was a one time code. What proof is there that I missed?
Anyone who thinks that a one time pad can be broken is wrong"Isn't that impossible?" Bischoff asks. "There is no way to break a one-time pad, short of stealing a copy."
"There was a lot of depth—many messages to work with."
TheGhostofOtto1923 and Lurker2358, seriously? Why don't you take that crap to another forum. This isn't the place for it and is COMPLETELY irrelevant to this topic.Well Lurker seems like a nice guy but his penchant for belief makes him also swallow the Bin Laden fantasy even a decade after Bin Laden was already declared dead by a member of the state department. Moreover three highly placed people in the intelligence community have come out with the fact that Israel did 911, and not some goatherder hiding in a Pakistani cave. But the religionists must deny facts because religion is a disease of the mind.
I find this strange how so many people seem to know that it was a one time code. What proof is there that I missed?
A worthy lead as to the identity of the sender, his plane & mission, would be Warrant Officer W. Stott, of the Royal Australian Air Force. Many Aussies served in the European theater from the Battle of Britain through the end of the war. Their bombers had carrier pigeons aboard, and the official rank would not reflect field promotions at the time of his "Missing/Presumed Dead status. You can see his name listed here in Casualty Communique 455, reprinted in a secondary publication that forwarded these casualty lists: (Filter banned me from listing the internet source).
From: Sergeant W. Scott
To: Second in Command
Greeting
Today the federal government of the nation deploys troops in northern command with 10 Panzer IV tanks type (judgpanzer) and 200 lightly and heavily armed men with Karabiner 43.
Greeting
At 13:25 of 6th day
I find this strange how so many people seem to know that it was a one time code. What proof is there that I missed?
Rafael:
"XO2 could easily be "Executive Officer 2/Second in Command"
...
There are algorithms that are easier to remember than trying to remember a 127 character random key word.
I don't think every commissioned and non-commission officer went around with a book of codes and cipher algorithms in their pocket during the war
antialias_physorg
Nov 23, 2012One-time pads have been used for a long time for very important messages. If the above code is written using one then there's no way to break it.
The numbetr code at the end may well be just that: a code to tell the recipient which page/paragraph of a one-time pad was used as the cypher/key.
The 'groups of five' letters clusters is very common in cryptography (it's just a way of writing messages and has no bearing on the cypher used).