Ole ira
Otto's computer died and his galaxy stupidphone won't let him select stars any more.
Anybody out there know how to fix this?
Keep up the good fight.
I do remember when estevan thought I was a bad guy until a bona-fide psychopath showed up here.
Spanky vs chucky.
I've also said this after thinking about conspiracies... smaller, shorter term conspiracies of interest. What we call monopolies.But such conspiracies we are told only happen for power or greed.
mental conditionsI think if there is a cure, or at least a remedy for psychopathy then science will produce it. We need a reliable way of identifying such people and limiting the damage that they do.
Well climate change doesn't have to be a fraud to be false, it's not something scientists are deliberately doing. It could just be bad science displayed by the community since the only way to predict future climate is to make a computer model, which isn't granted to work perfectly. But that's not science yet.
Anybody out there know how to fix this?
Ole ira
Otto's computer died and his galaxy stupidphone won't let him select stars any more.
Anybody out there know how to fix this?
Keep up the good fight.
So not only is a conspiracy the least likely explanation for anything due to the many factors involvedOrganized crime is conspiracy. Cronyism is conspiracy. Humans have a natural tendency to collude and conspire which is the basis of tribalism.
"the only way to predict future climate is to make a computer model"
Well, actually there are quite a few climate computer models. But the fascinating thing is that people who reject those models believe predictions about what will happen to the economy if we try to reduce carbon emissions. Climate computer models have uncertainties, but economic forecasting is on the level of killing a chicken and reading the entrails. So how come climate models are unreliable, but voodoo economic predictions are reliable?
eric, which hospital or clinic or station?George kamburoff the psychopath (IMO - of course?) just wanted to make sure it wasn't the one he has been treated at for the last 50yrs or so.
The language is wrong. They're a mythos, not a theory. The difference is the falsifyability criterion. That's where faith and ego identity and mental deficits take over from testability or the ability to state exactly what your null hypothesis is. I've never heard one of the nutters coherently state nor test any null hypothesis.Historical events are unfalsifiable.
....The better approach would be to acknowledge data inconsistencies and explain/refute them directly instead of ad hominem attacks on those who raise the questions.
You should really try to keep your pants on whenever you find the urge to spew online. Have someone with intelligence explain how the proposed methods to reduce carbon emissions; viz. carbon tax, carbon trading, fuel from food crops, etc, can and will affect the economy.
If you wonder why there are conspiracy nuts, it is because there are conspiracies. The Gulf of Tonkin was one. Another reason is the evidence: I have seen military aircraft crash, all kinds, and cleaned up from a few. In every case, the jet engine spools survive battered, but are unmistakable. No bypass engine spools were found at the Pentagon. The empennage of most typical aircraft such as the Boeings break off and often survive fairly intact. No trace of one here at all. The wings make large areas of damage. None of that was evident at the Pentagon. No Boeing airliner went into that building.
I have no idea what really happened, or where the real airliner went, but it was not into the Pentagon.
Okay, Mulligan, howabout this:Okay psychopath how about this:
When I was in the Air Force at Edwards we had two XB-70s which could go Mach three, 2,000 mph, and well as three variants of Blackbird, and X-15s which hold the world record of 4,500 mph. That was in 1967
I am not convinced those are still the fastest we have flown. But to assume otherwise requires a lot of closed lips-And what makes you think that soldering wires and plugging things in as a 20yo tech makes you an authority on anything besides plugging and soldering?
"Equation shows that large-scale conspiracies would quickly reveal themselves."Haha you don't know how true this actually is. Because, well, you're a god lover aren't you?
The logic of this conclusion is flawed because the bible reveals the greatest conspiracy in human history
So how did the author account for things such as the Klu Klux Klan?This is very interesting. The war itself was fought to destroy a slave-based economy which had become obsolete with the industrial revolution. Sizeable percentages of the workforce north and south had been killed, leaving jobs open for millions of former slaves.
julianpenrod
Jan 26, 2016