"Could" seems to be the word most used by scientists these days.
"Could" seems to be the word most used by scientists these days.
If you looking for guarantees you got to go to church Skippy.
But we don't even know if gravitational waves really exist. The theory of gravity is still full of unknowns.
Laissez les bons temps rouler Skippy(s) ol Ira is on the job.
Not objecting to GR, ya unnerstan, just to your objection.
The problem with "ripples in spacetime" is that nothing can move in spacetime by definition.
Remember who pays your salaries.
All I can see is your momma's arse
Not everybody is fooled.
"Could" seems to be the word most used by scientists these days.
This is not a Facebook, but a thread about physics. The people's names are irrelevant here.
What ever happened to VendicarE? And Fleetfoot?
@Protoplasmix: reported.
Good luck with this new gadget. I hope you find something. No detector to date has been able to
about how gravitational wave radiation might be directly detected, or what might be observable
Both at times obnoxious but super smart
There is no "spacetime"
Ask yourself: how much time do you experience when your sleeping?
The_Dark_Side_of_the_Higgs_Field_and_General_Relativity: https://www.acade...lativity
@otero: When you're not looking, I'm just a waveform.@Protoplasmix
The censors, name callers and twaddlers must be censored systematically.@zeph
Note to Phys.Org@TechnoCreed
This short note is to advise you that the troll known as Zephir is on Phys.Org with, at least, 25 pseudonyms, 21 of those were created on the 10th of July. Please correct this situation.
The censors, name callers and twaddlers must be censored systematicallythis time I suggested an IP ban, and I hope the site complies
, we can say as easily, they were formed with one of you for to discredit me and to provide an evasion for my banning from PO@zephir
it's entertaining to watch, how the regular voting trolls are getting upset with itand by that you mean everyone who downvotes you.
IP address and time of every post, so they will realize, these accounts aren't mine@zephir
IMO this is the actual reason, why we are discussing the social issues here all the time: for most of lonely elderly chaps here it's more palatable topic, than the actual science.@zephir
IMO this is the actual reason, why we are discussing the social issues here all the time: for most of lonely elderly chaps here it's more palatable topic, than the actual science@zephir
Then all of the sudden we see a flood of sock-puppets upvoting zephir and cantdrive, and downvoting anyone with an argument against them.
the list for you, Proto…
And at the case when you don't understand it, then your attitude remains religious anyway.@zephir
Between you and me, NORAD was MIA on 9/11/01 and our oath keeps me awake nights.@proto
And at the case when you don't understand it, then your attitude remains religious anyway.@zephir
so you are saying that you are religious in regard to mainstream physics? surely you dont mean that because someone requires empirical data for proof that it is considered religious?
Yep. Their newest strategy is to upvote their victim with twenty sockpuppets accounts (actualy the only activity, which these guys manage well in their life), to report it as a violation of forum rules and to achieve its banning in this way. Very nice, indeed.
Yep, I can see it. The largest popsci site is controlled with bots of anonymous readers...
…especially concerning the middle east issues, of which I have been a participant... and the Constitution here at home
You know why that is, George?@Protoplasmix
things were much simpler when I was in (82-86)I was in Germany during that time. Ramstein and Wurzburg. when they bombed Ramstein. They tried to blow up Wurzburg and a few other places too.
Note to Phys.Org@TechnoCreed
@ Doiea-Skippy hooyeeei that ol Ira is one smart@Ira
BTW The uncensored copy of this page is here.@DoieaS- Zephir
@DoieaS- Zephir
did you know that in the link you left showing the "uncensored page" the information has been put back in there... BUT UNDER THE DoieaS MONIKER, NOT OTERO, which was originally being used...
@ Captain-Skippy Is that what that thing is?@Ira
@ Captain-Skippy Is that what that thing is?@Ira
you can go here http://www.7-zip....oad.html
and get an extractor to read the information in the page.
its free
Is he something you think I want? Or is he something I won't ever need again because I have never needed one yet except for this Socratic-Skippy thing?@Ira
The on-line copy of the posts censored from here you can read (and comment) here@DoieaS-Zephir
You know why that is@Protoplasmix
Judean People's Front, and the People's Front of Judea, and -- I really shouldn't make light of it ...
All people who were willing to discuss some physics were deleted from here, only twaddlers remained@Zephir
The PO staff provides in this way, no controversial topics will be discussed herethey are LEAVING controversial stuff and deleting pseudosceince, per the forum rules. when you taint your profile with pseudoscience, they delete the profile taking posts with it... you can plainly see that CANTDRIVE posts are still up (controversial) even though he posts KNOWN pseudoscience too, likely because the mod's do not know enough about physics to comprehend where some of his EI is impossible. stuff even YOU've downvoted, zeph
You'd count your drooling idiocies as on-topic? Why am I not even a little bit surprised?@Dr. Toad
How many of you did they delete?
You can try to calculate it.@zephir
but you're deeply bellow my level of discussion@zephir
someone would try to post the same at my site, you would be immediately deleted for ignorance and idiocythat is because you don't like empirical data. I HAVE shared WHY AW was debunked, and if you go to ANY physics laboratory/site/learning forum/etc, you will find the SAME argument as well as the SAME point of view for the SAME reasons, with only ONE exception: YOUR SITE.
The AWT was never disprovedWRONG AGAIN
If you would take a look at my posts in their condensed state, I'm just discussing the physics at quite different level, than anyone of you here@zephir
This is how the posts at PO site should appear: no name calling, no down/upvoting, no desperate frog&mice personal battles - just links to publications and PHYSICS@zephir
you're feeling itself unhappy from your apparent incompetence to organize any better matter of fact discussion herenope. I've provided logic and evidence
On the contrary, all my posts here were based on empirical data@zephir
I know and understand perfectly, what the above study is aboutas do others.
I'm not mad about anything - do you think, it's the first time I was deleted from some forum? My existence doesn't depend on it at all@zephir
LOL. The development of voting bots is UncleIra game@zephir
How many times I tried to explain it to just you here? Six-times? Seven-times?@zephir
You? Oh, come on. You're too silly for being able to do it at the first sightthen why did you post (as otero) that it was me?
doesn't violate the forum rulesas long as you keep to science, to which AW/DAW is NOT...
After all, "Captain Stumpy" is not your first, neither last account here as well - so where the problem is?@zephir
many people here feel threatened with me insteadspoken like a true religious radical.
I'm banned periodically from herefor violating FORUM rules, especially the ones about pseudoscience
LOL. The development of voting bots is UncleIra game, not mine one. He just plays with you, that's all.
Everyone and all of my votes comes from IRA.This is account, which your voting bots are using too, as Reality Check demonstrated. All other votes aren't indeed yours ones, but these ones of bots.
I was in Germany during that time. Ramstein and Wurzburg. when they bombed Ramstein. They tried to blow up Wurzburg and a few other places too.
as Reality Check demonstrated@zephir
Name one voting bot I have made? Just one? Everyone and all of my votes comes from IRA@Ira
re 'nobody messes with anybody' as being a reference to the Cold War@Protoplasmix
Wow, first I've heard of it. Had to checkI keep forgetting about the news and how it was publicised (not well)... it was BIG news in the stars and stripes and AFRTS, militaryTV/News
@Ira
don't let him get to you, Ira. He is baiting you with the intention of making you fly off the handle and start posting irrelevant nonsense: AKA TROLL
The PO admins managed to delete just the only six posts, which were on topic here during last three days@zephir
you can read (and comment) here.I PROVED THAT YOU POSTED KNOWN A PSEUDOSCIENCE LINK BY PROVIDING WITH A LEGITIMATE PEER REVIEWED PAPER SUPPORTING MY CONCLUSION THAT AW/DAW was PSEUDOSCIENCE and DEBUNKED TO A HIGH DEGREE OF ACCURACY
.........yep, and neither one of them can talk the language of the science of gravity & energy, that language is known as "differential equations", I seriously doubt either one could solve a problem involving a trigonometric function much less the language of Einstein's thesis on gravity.
the only six posts, which were on topic here during last three days@DoieaS-zephir
Irrelevant nonsense are all posts of Captain Stumpy and Uncle Ira in this threadbut forgot about your post 5 hours ago when you stated
The AWT was never disproved, only downvoted with scripted bots and senile trolls of the same IQ. This is indeed a difference.I've given EMPIRICAL PROOF that it was debunked, not downvoted with scripted bots.
neither one of them can talk the language of the science@beni-haha
@Protoplasmix Don't want to words in George's mouth but would that be something to do with the amoun tof energy increase and the amount of energy from that increase, available to do the 'extra' work one desires? I've deliberately used common/inaccurate terminology and no equations.
I keep forgetting about the news and how it was publicised (not well)... it was BIG news in the stars and stripes and AFRTS, militaryTV/News
I lost a friend in that bombing (not publicised)
lost one in the Wurzburg bombing too as collateral damage (hit by a car trying to evacuate a bldg that had a bomb in it)
grew up with terrorism
otero
Jul 10, 2014