Unknown? There is that wall painting that seems to make it obvious they did, or why would they bother depicting it?
Unknown? There is that wall painting that seems to make it obvious they did, or why would they bother depicting it?
The explanation was painted on the walls of a well-known, centuries ago-discovered pyramid the whole time. Do you think Science just now figured it out or knew all along and lied? Hard to swallow the concept of Egyptologists staring for centuries at those paintings, wondering what they mean when they are freakin' how-to drawings. A smart ten year old might have figured it out.try reading some history, start here you dunce: http://en.wikiped...ki/Egypt
I suspect Egypt has a large hand in not solving the mysteries of Egypt. If it did not have this "mysterious" history, that nation would have little.
There are several artifacts that document the use of water to move the sledges. I worked on a project 5 years ago where we found this written in hieroglyphics. You can see this interactively in gigapixel detail here http://www.xrez.c...-images/
Did it occur to you that perhaps the person depicted may have been performing some sort of libation ritual, or that there might be some other symbolic meaning for the action?
An illustration is not the same thing as an explicit inscription, so we'll have to let it rest as an unknown, given the absence of additional qualifying information.
Second part of Breasted's translation of the inscription immediately following the image of the workmen in the article:
Behold, this statue, being a squared block on coming forth from the great mountain, was more valuable than anything. Vessels were equipped, filled with supplies, [in advance (?)] of my army of recruits, the youth bore [... in advance of (?)] it. Their words were laudation, and my praises from the king. ; the judge and local governor who were appointed for ... in this city, and established for the [...] upon the river, their hearts had not thought of this which I had done, [in that I made (?)] for myself ... established for eternity, after this my tomb was complete in its everlasting work.
A tomb without a body .... or writing .... hmmm....
On a side note, how they get from moving a statue to moving a pyramid stone is beyond me.
How did they get enough water for moving each stone in a DESERT?
Uhm? So again, how exactly did they place that last heavy block of stone at the very top of any pyramid?Uh they stood on the platform at the very top of the spiral ramp.
Egypt was a fertile and green land in the two or three thousand years BCESorry you're off by about 10k years.
Uhm? So again, how exactly did they place that last heavy block of stone at the very top of any pyramid?
why did we just barely survive for over 100K years and then all of a sudden realize, hey...we should get together and like farm and build shelter and stuff. It doesn't really make any sense,
The question isn't how people built stuff 4000 years ago. It is why were humans here for 120K years and we only have civilization for 12K"Between 10,000 and 13,000 years ago, the ancestors of modern cattle, sheep, goats and pigs were domesticated in [the Fertile Crescent]. The gradual transition from wild harvesting to deliberate cultivation happened independently in several areas around the globe. Agriculture allowed for the support of an increased population, leading to larger societies and eventually the development of cities..." Etc.
@SR,
Thanks for digging up that translation.
Your point regarding the libation might be valid, but remains uncertain.
What _is_ certain, though, is that nowhere in the translation does it say anyone poured water on sand to sledge the statue across.
Maybe 90 weight?
You might have a point. Look underneath the statue in the picture. What are those people carrying? It looks like three of them are carrying wheels (just my imagination?)
The Moon then came in for a landing... exhuming massive amounts of limestone to form the Ozarks@Kalopin
the pyramids of Giza were built by djinns who were summoned up by the Anunnaki from a non-physical dimension@dballard614
It looks like three of them are carrying wheels (just my imagination?)@Sinister1812
@dballard614
if the Giza pyramids were built by djinn, then why are there tool marks on the stone?
I just GOTTA see your empirical data proving this one
What if most of the weight was at the back, and thus lifted the front end up so it never dug in?
Also the Egyptian image shows a large curve at the front far more than the experiment has, that doesn't seem to like an accurate representation ....
Is it true that the cap stones on Pyramids were gold plated?I don't know why don't you look it up? This is the internet you know. Perhaps you're afraid you'll come across real history such as
This object is vastly, vastly smaller than many blocks in the pyramids, and especially at certain other construction sites where ~1000 ton blocks are stacked 3 high.
Maybe they made some kind of jack mechanism out of copper or bronze? I don't think they had iron working yet when some of this was done. Why bother with stone if they could do that though?
Is it true that the cap stones on Pyramids were gold plated? I've seen that claimed on AA and other history channel shows, but history channel is unreliable for the majority of technical details, because those guys are loons and biased as hell.
Are we sure that the substance poured is water - or just water? ...
..."In Christianity: An Ancient Egyptian Religion author Ahmed Osman contends...
Are we sure that the substance poured is water - or just water? ...
When there are inscriptions extant and present directly above, below, or next to the person pouring water in the depictions, the Egyptian word for water (mu) generally is used, as shown in one of the examples I provided above that still has its inscription next to the water pourer. The pots depicted also were water pots.
As it is said: "correlation is not causation", and --like it or not-- if the inscription does not explicitly state that the water is being poured to enable the sledging, then it is mere supposition to claim so.
You will have to provide a definitive answer for this in terms of an inscription, its translation, and its explicit statement of this specific use relating to any object or objects being moved via such method, which you have thus far failed to do.
Otherwise it remains pure conjecture.
The Moon then came in for a landing... exhuming massive amounts of limestone to form the Ozarks@Kalopin
this does not explain the Ouachita mountains, their east/west orientation, and the fact that they have a completely different geological makeup than the Ozarks
There is no question that water alone will not reduce the friction coefficient and make easy to move the heavy limestone blocks.Surface active agent mixed with fine sands can slide these heavy limestone blocks very easy.Surface active agents can be produced from the reaction of an acid ( e.g oil, the fat of a pig) and a base ( such as costic soda). How can you make caustic soda ?
pushed in front of this impact and out to the side@Kalopin
The Moon then came in for a landing, impacting the Mediterraneangiven the mass & size of the moon and a collision course, even a graze would cause considerable more havoc than what you speculate. any "collision" would also form certain things we would still see today, and the East/West orientation of the Ouachita's with no curvature aligned with a Mediterranean impact that would show deformation of the range as well as deformation in the Quapaw, Rockies, Smokies and other ranges still visible today
pushed in front of this impact and out to the side@Kalopin
specifically, I have issue withThe Moon then came in for a landing, impacting the Mediterraneangiven the mass & size of the moon and a collision course, even a graze would cause considerable more havoc than what you speculate. any "collision" would also form certain things we would still see today, and the East/West orientation of the Ouachita's with no curvature aligned with a Mediterranean impact that would show deformation of the range as well as deformation in the Quapaw, Rockies, Smokies and other ranges still visible today
Your philosophy seems to be flawed as well as not supported by empirical data. There is no correlation between the topic, your gravity conjecture and your philosophy of the moon's collusion with land formation.
Think of this hypothesis when studying these events: ...
Claptrap. Nothing more.
The question isn't how people built stuff 4000 years ago. It is why were humans here for 120K years and we only have civilization for 12K"Between 10,000 and 13,000 years ago, the ancestors of modern cattle, sheep, goats and pigs were domesticated in [the Fertile Crescent]. The gradual transition from wild harvesting to deliberate cultivation happened independently in several areas around the globe. Agriculture allowed for the support of an increased population, leading to larger societies and eventually the development of cities..." Etc.
-I hate it when people guess about things they should realize scientists have been working on for a long time. And which can easily be found on the INTERNET.
If there is limestone ejecta it is because of the impact at Chixalub,for that entire region contains a substantial mass of limestone.
If the moon came ever that close, there would have been massive effects that would have exterminated complex life as we know it and left traces erosion caused by ocean waves over 1000 feet high.The rotation rate of the Earth would have been changed in such a way that would have caused the winds to rip around the planet at over 500 mph.
Most complex life would have been exterminated by a sandblasting effect and the moon would have shattered and become a ring orbiting the Earth because of its approach to within the Roche Limit. Even if the moon were made of solid iron (it isn't) it still would have shattered like any mass that enters within the Roche Limit of a more massive body.
There is no correlation between the topic, your gravity conjecture and your philosophy of the moon's collusion with land formation.
The Mariannas trench is NOT in a subduction zone, it is in a divergent zone, where the plates are seperating. . ;-]
In the late Pleistocene the Moon was in a low and unstable orbit due to Pangaea's weight all on one side of Earth, causing imbalance. The Moon then came in for a landing, impacting the Mediterranean, scraping and burning material pushing into a pile known as the Appalachia mountain range, exhuming massive amounts of limestone to form the Ozarks, Rock of Gibraltar, Betic Cordilleras, the many structures throughout southwest U.S., Ecuador, Chile and Peru and covering the Yucatan Peninsula, the pyramids and temples in melt rock.
This lunar impact event not only caused mass extinction, it slowed the outer plates and mantle in relation to the faster moving inner core, causing an increase in electromagnetism, gravity and the length of Earth's day [by approx. 34 min.]
Many if not most of the monolithic structures were built during the Pleistocene, when there was considerably less gravity.
Kalopin, you stated:
The Mariannas trench is NOT in a subduction zone, it is in a divergent zone, where the plates are seperating. . ;-]
Uh-oh, it appears that the established science sharply disagrees with your geomorphological theorizing:
http://www.ask.co...#Geology
I normally hesitate to utlize the Wiki --but in this case, it provides a succinct, understandable-from-the-layman's-view summary of the known mechanics.
Mariana Trench = subduction zone.
I'll leave the rest of your assertions alone, provided you desist in this enterprise.
Uh-oh, it appears that the established science sharply disagrees with your geomorphological theorizing:
The Arabian plate was attached to west Africa
Sorry, my bad- The Arabian plate was attached to EAST Africa...;-]
Kalopin, you stated:
The Mariannas trench is NOT in a subduction zone, it is in a divergent zone, where the plates are seperating. . ;-]
Uh-oh, it appears that the established science sharply disagrees with your geomorphological theorizing:
[...]
I normally hesitate to utlize the Wiki --but in this case, it provides a succinct, understandable-from-the-layman's-view summary of the known mechanics.
Mariana Trench = subduction zone.
I'll leave the rest of your assertions alone, provided you desist in this enterprise.
Yes, they are wrong. The Mariannas trench was split apart, not pushed together. Subduction zones subdue, divergent zones seperate. Is a trench a place that has been pushed together or pulled apart?
Read on and see what else our 'modern' science is badly mistaken about [dating, petrification, impacts,...and the list rteally does go on...]
no other o
Surely you were aware that Iceland literally is pulling part because it sits on two separate tectonic plates, weren't you?
Cayman trench? Strike-slip deformation combined with currently occurring eastward movement of the Caribbean plate.
Tsunamis are oceanic events, not "river" events. The Carolina Bays have differing creation dates, all of which predate 1811 by 12,000 and many more years, depending on location sampled and dated.
Tsunamis are oceanic events, not "river" events. The Carolina Bays have differing creation dates, all of which predate 1811 by 12,000 and many more years, depending on location sampled and dated.
Jees!, massive waves up the river, then! I guess 'river tsunamis' can be my term as well
;-]]]]]]]
The Carolinabays were not dated properly. They sit on a coastline where they would have easily eroded in such a time frame as is considered. They are all elliptical, have white sand rims that are all higher on the northwest side. there are no trees near two hundred years old on or near them and there are even reports of many massive meteorscoming in before during and after the earthquakes...
Please see Captain Robert Alaexander's account: http://pasadena.w...ell.html correct link. please read its entirety when you get a chance, but this has been edited, removing the volcano story...
Iceland and the trench are splitting from the same divergence. The trench is filling in as it is pulled apart. Theresurelymay be some subduction along divergent boundaries, as plates are not straight..., but a trench is formed from seperation not compression.
The Caymen trench was formed from the pressure of the north American plate lifting at the hotspot and pressing down at Belize. This pulled out the islands forming the Caribbeansea and Gulf of Mexico...
1811 catastrophies: http://ebooks.aid...r14.html
http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/office/hough/mitchill.html
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/humboldt/alexander/travels/chapter14.html
Do you even read what you link for others? None of it supports your hypothesis of multiple meteorite strikes in 1811.@Skepticus_Rex
As to the Carolina Bays, they were dated as correctly as possible. None are from 1811. They also are not all aligned the same directionIMHO- he's a troll
Meteoritic impact is no longer widely regarded as a plausible hypothesis. No meteoritic fragments have been found that are genetically related to the Carolina Bays. No known meteorite falls elsewhere in the world have resulted in approximately half a million depressions over a wide area. Studies of magnetic anomalies associated with individual bays are not conclusive (MacCarthy, 1936; Prouty, 1952). Shatter cones and high pressure changes in quartz grains associated with known impact craters are absent. The heavy mineralogy of sediments within one bay did not differ from sediments beyond the bay rim (Preston and Brown, 1964). The selective confinement of Carolina Bays to one physiographic province has also been cited as evidence against any extraterrestrial hypothesis.
More ridiculous claptrap. If there is limestone ejecta it is because of the impact at Chixalub, for that entire region contains a substantial mass of limestone.
.
Should I apologize forthe truth?
Should I apologize forthe truth?
No apology needed as there is no "truth" simply stop posting and we'll all be better off.
You remind me of another poster who constantly makes outlandish claims with nothing to substantiate them, alleges they are "theories/models" then challenges everyone to either disprove him or blindly accept his drivel as fact.
As always the burden of proof is the claimants to bear, no-one needs to disprove anything that you or anyone else claims to be "THE TRUTH".
Your model contradicts the actual directions that tectonic plates are moving, and movements can be observed using GIS and other technologies.
Your own sources cited say the lights originated from the ground. .
oh yea, Skepticus Rex,
...they used many techniques such as wetting the sand, but there was also less gravity...
why do I know the pyramids and temples were built on Pangaea during the Pleistocene?- when you put the Pangaea puzzle together in the manner I have suggested then the pyramids align with the poles, just as the ones in Bosnia...
The pyramids and obelisks were a wireless power grid...
you have been taught false beliefs until it became reality@kalopin
The dating is inaccurategive EMPIRICAL DATA supporting this
the proof is in everyone's face and the deniers look stupidyou dont look stupid as much as crazy
you see- intelligence will always look crazy to blundering idiotsyou are not blundering as much as MISLEAD. perhaps some education in modern physics would help?
Please study the photosyou know, if you studied the EMPIRICAL DATA as hard as you looked at the photo's, you would not be ranting here
Skepticus Rex,
You and your constituents have what is referred to as 'the allegory of the cave syndrome' in which you have been taught false beliefs until it became reality. The dating is inaccurate.
...know there is no other option!;-]
I hope you all understand that, even if there were plenty of naturally occurrring earthquake lights from all sources [charged rock, quartz crystals, gas pockets, ball lightning,...] that there would be NO WAY that they could have been seen at the distances that were reported.
Do you really think that earthquake lights could be seen in Savannah Georgia all the way to New Madrid Missouri? You know, you can't even see, or hear a fireworks diplay fromm the next town over.
oh yea, I should mention- Skepticus Rex, your link does help to prove one of the energy sources for the pyramids- charged rock- "...seismic waves...,...compresses the rocks...,...creating conditions under which large amounts of positive and negative electrical charges are generated..."
"basalt and gabbro...,...defects in their crystals..."!
do you see all this coming together? ;-]
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/05/28/pyramid.markings/index.html?iref=obinsite
ever get the goosebumps? so does rock. this similar 'shiver' effect between dissimilar rocks, the sun's heat to charge in day, the moon's force to send seismic tidal effect at night, can create massive amounts of electricity in such a structure,
or,
...
through your entire link they admit they do not know, but think they found the workers.
of course they will find many skeletons in such a populated place...
quote- {...the pyramid you know, has magic, it has mystery, it is a structure that was built 4600 years ago. there is no accurate book, until now that explains all that..." Hawass postulates this position, yet has no evidence to support his 4,600 year claim. even if the dating was accurate, the 'workmen' could just as easily been 'repairmen' from this time.
...
I think you miss the point, there are pyramids in melt rock! ;-]
please give another example anywhere of a hotspot causing an entire tectonic plate to warp!
The Arsdale/Cox article
When hotspots move, portions of the crust can sink, which is what happened to the Embayment. Hawaii resulted from a hotspot. Should it ever move the entire chain could sink below sea level. That is Geology 101. Same process.
Actually, you are quite wrong about the Ozarks and the region. There actually are igneous rocks buried under layers of limestone and other sedimentary rock.@Skepticus_Rex
Actually, you are quite wrong about the Ozarks and the region. There actually are igneous rocks buried under layers of limestone and other sedimentary rock.@Skepticus_Rex
I applaud your efforts here with Korkypin, but it really doesn't matter if you post that pterodactyl droppings made the Ozarks, as he/she/it is incapable of learning (at least REAL science anyway).
I doubt he/she/it has read any of your links above. it actually seems a bit sad that he/she/it would expend so much energy on such an outlandish fantasy while ignoring empirical data...but that is also the reason psychiatrists/psychologists have studies and watch the loonies.
I hope you manage to convince them of reason and logic, but I remain very skeptical of that.
PEACE
all I am trying to do is tell you the truth@kalopin
'modern science' has become- a religion@kaloopa
unable to accept facts and any changeFUNNY! the only way to actually make a name in science is to either prove something RIGHT or prove something WRONG (see: Einstein)
"empirical data' is exactly what I have postedyou have posted NO empiricla data. You've posted YOUR INTERPRETATION of your delusional visions and a philosophy which is only substantiated by your own opinion
There was initially plenty of evidence for the pyramids being built during the Pleistocenedelusional conjecture based upon blatant stupidity (you've already been corrected, so this is NOT ignorance)
even after the catastrophe, some of the technology and devices were still in useconspiratorial delusional conjecture based upon even WORSE stupidity... with ZERO evidence
French and Spanish 'explorers/conquerors' did much of the damage@kookaburra
until he discovered they had taken the reactor, manna machine and 'voice coil' from the great pyramidthis is even worse than the other BS! this delusion is based upon fantasy and has no basis in reality at all
all you need do is point out where I am mistakenSkepticus has already done that. you just don't believe it, mostly because your meds are not stable yet
where do my 'interpretations' not agree with the geography or history?re-read all your posts above
No, this is NO congame-THIS IS SINCERE!the best con men truly believe in what they are saying... makes it easier to convice the others
sometimes there is more than two sides to a story!:
http://www.aquizi...ogy.html
Next, the original name in the inscription (between "Dual King" and "Son of Re'") was Menmaatre (Seti I). The inscription was overwritten with Usermaatre-setepenre (Ramesses II).
and then you admit that the inscriptions were overwritten?
There are more logical interpretations:
http://www.hallof...dos.html
the effects from this impact were exactly the correct amount for the results that are apparent
maybe they drew over them again when they dug them up? ;-]]]]]]]
Play around with the scenarios yourself at: http://www.purdue...ctearth/@Skepticus_Rex
really a plethora of links describing ancient flight and all the obvious building technology@Kookoo
About 4,650,000 results (0.30 seconds)this is NO WAY proves that there are fairies, fairy turds or anything like it, only that someone is willing to write about it.
So, where is the Karnak inscription I asked you to show to me?@Skepticus_Rex
the technology we have today- almost every single bit was derived from studying the pyramids and temples and these depictions and writingsI mean... WOW!
it would mean the Moon would impact from the east and would be the correct direction for the break up of Pangaea and the direction in which all the continents were ejectedThis is what it looks like when a moon-sized object hits an earth-sized object
You do NOT know how much or which direction the Moon was already spinning at impact!
Impact science is badly flawed and does not take into consideration the amount of electromagnetic repulsion from such a large object [mass, weight, volume, DENSITY] The Moon can easily take an impact on such a soft surface as the outer plates, oceans and the inland sea in which it impacted [Tethys ocean]
yes, they had the ability of spaceflight and all the amenities.
...
No, no evidence when an entire tectonic plate lands on top of much of it and massive waves full of debris wash back and forth over
...What are you people thinking?! There is PLENTY evidence right in front of you! There is NO evidence for present beliefs!
convection can not break up a supercontinent and pyramids were not built in caves!
...
p.s. there would be much less evidence of our technology after such an incident-think!
Impact science is badly flawed and does not take into consideration the amount of electromagnetic repulsion from such a large object [mass, weight, volume, DENSITY- says the retard. You're not a particularly clever or funny troll are you? Trolls enjoy making up outrageous nonsense in order to bait legitimate posters. For what reason? For what reason were they born so disfigured?
Impact science is badly flawed and does not take into consideration the amount of electromagnetic repulsion from such a large object [mass, weight, volume, DENSITY- says the retard. You're not a particularly clever or funny troll are you? Trolls enjoy making up outrageous nonsense in order to bait legitimate posters. For what reason? For what reason were they born so disfigured?
Why don't you go back to building pyramids in your sandbox? Or is your mom still pissed that you tried to bury your little sister there as a mummy?
Back in the days when Ed started carving out his original stones, ...his was a generation who knew accomplishments by the sweat of the brow. It wasn't mysticism but hard work, this is how Ed really accomplished the massive project....
For decades, the park featured a perfectly balanced stone gate that, despite its weight, would easily swing open with a strong breeze or the push of a finger. How it worked remained a mystery until 1986 when it stopped moving. When the gate was removed it was revealed that it rotated on a metal shaft and rested on a truck bearing.... Though the quarried stone slabs are large, they are actually lighter than they appear because the rock is porous.
it would mean the Moon would impact from the east and would be the correct direction for the break up of Pangaea and the direction in which all the continents were ejectedThis is what it looks like when a moon-sized object hits an earth-sized object
http://www.ancientx.com/nm/anmviewer.asp?a=62
so, you say- "So much for the mystery"?
when, where, why and how?
Hello retardit would mean the Moon would impact from the east and would be the correct direction for the break up of Pangaea and the direction in which all the continents were ejectedThis is what it looks like when a moon-sized object hits an earth-sized object
https://www.youtu..._JBQtH9o
-The crust would still be molten. Obviously.
it is not understood that comets can disrupt and push massive amounts of cosmic rays out in different directions-is particularly repulsive.
By the way, the only effects of a comet passing the earth at close range are fear and an influx of cranks and pseudoscience into and among the general population.@Skepticus
it is not understood that comets can disrupt and push massive amounts of cosmic rays out in different directions.
are you all getting this yet?Yeah.
Impact science is badly flawed and does not take into consideration the amount of electromagnetic repulsion from such a large object... once the Moon has reached the edge of Earth's magnetosphere [at magnetopause] it will, once again begin to spin in retrograde... comets... pushing pressure waves of charged particles... to send vibrations between tectonic plates to cause an excess amount of convectionYoure an immense retard.
Mike Baillie's research?Is he a retard like you? ;-]]]]]]]
Mike Baillie's research?Is he a retard like you? ;-]]]]]]]
are you all getting this yet?Yeah.Impact science is badly flawed and does not take into consideration the amount of electromagnetic repulsion from such a large object... once the Moon has reached the edge of Earth's magnetosphere [at magnetopause] it will, once again begin to spin in retrograde... comets... pushing pressure waves of charged particles... to send vibrations between tectonic plates to cause an excess amount of convectionYoure an immense retard.
If you do a search you can see that a poster named kalopin has gotten his ass banned from other forums for posting the same outrageous nonsense.
Cant you take a hint??Mike Baillie's research?Is he a retard like you? ;-]]]]]]]
our Sun emits radiation called cosmic rays:
the Moon picked up massive amounts of ice, sand, dust,...on its way in to first orbit the Sun.
waves of charged particles travelling out from the Sun are disrupted and sent toward planets, moons asteroids
there were slight effects with Elenin and Ison-but you can see it happen every time- the serious scientists all say the same thing- 'this comet could cause problems!'
their effects have been documented within tree rings and ice core data.
I believe you have been duped?
our Sun emits radiation called cosmic raysLike skepticus says, the link you posted SAYS THE OPPOSITE
I've been reading his comments for a week now and I still can't decideMaybe this will help.
otto your one of those idiots who just replies to be in on a conversation. you have little to know intelligence in any of these matters and have no clue or suggestionDuh well I know what a cosmic ray is and I know you don't, and I read the refs I post.
if you would like to learn more, visit-@kaplopin
"the photon, a master of time and space" @thunderbolts.info
if you would like to learn more, visit-@kaplopin
"the photon, a master of time and space" @thunderbolts.info
now I KNOW that you have absolutely NO SCIENTIFIC BASIS for your delusional beliefs.
thunderbutts links means electric universe, which has been THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED... is there some science in it? yes, but mass delusion as well as misinterpretation of known physics as well... and no electrical engineer with zero familiarity in astrophysics is going to be able to explain the cosmos in any terms because there is too much missing that he is unaware of, like the effects of gravity on large scales, etc.
IOW - you are a delusional crackpot touting pseudoscience and hallucinations
I suggest going back to school and at least getting your GED or high school diploma as high school level science is all that's needed to refute your arguments here. I also recommend getting back on your meds. and going back to your shrink
IOW - you are a delusional crackpot touting pseudoscience and hallucinations
the Moon had to bring in the amount of hydrogen and oxygen to a molten planet in the 'goldilocks' zone. it did not originate splitting away from Earth, as this close to impossible!
isotopes and chemicals received from impact?
comets push the radiation from our sun, as well as the high energy particles from other stars!
now, please do your best to answer, at least one of the unanswered questions that have been posed@KaPLOPin
can't argue, so you must hide?argue WHAT?
On an illusional quest for the reinvention of the wheel,rethink the light bulb, and rewrite history.A little book that has a great hope to find common ground for our children.What will be Kalopins' Legacy?
[-yes- instructions for the mechanisms]
Archaeology: European Pyramid is natural hill
17:04:00 09/05/2006
[Culture and Society]
(ANSAmed) - SARAJEVO, MAY 9 - The hill of Visocica, which would conceal the first European pyramid, is the work of nature and not of man. So argues a team of eight geologists of the University of Tuzla, and after surveys on the sides of the hill oriented towards the four cardinal points, they concluded that it consists of layered sediments of varying thickness, while its regular shape is the result of endodynamic and isodynamic processes in the post-Miocene era. Y47 (All rights reserved)
On thinking a bit about the above translation, I think I might prefer the translation "?
The Mayan hieroglyphics tell us that their ancestors came from the Pleiades… first arriving at Atlantis where they created an advanced civilization.
The building of temples in the shape of pyramids enabled the Maya to obtain more energy… from the interior of the Earth, because the pyramids were erected on energy potent points… and from the cosmos, because the energy coming from outside the Earth was maintained longer and was more intense in the pyramids. For additional energy effect the Maya placed powerful quartz crystals at the top of the pyramids. Thus an additional energy field was created for those who needed energy to move through other spiritual dimensions or for healing purposes.
what happened to the Chickasaw, Clovis and the ancients?
did they all just dissappear?
what happened to the Pangaean plate? did it just slowly break apart?
if there is no one to intervene, then it appears soon everyone will believe the workers all got drunk, stood around and pissed on the sand to move the stones!
corn is not from cross-breeding. it is a whole new plant, reliant on humans and purposely designed....
you all are distorting reality in such a bad way as to misinterpret and destroy all true history!
maybe you should inform the geoscience community that there was no Pangaean plate: http://www.nature...250.html "Self-subduction of the Pangaean global plate" the impact's design is the same as a baseball hitting a windshield, please note the fracturing around the Mediterranean!
Caliban
Apr 30, 2014Unknown.
Also unknown is whether or not they actually employed this "trick" regardless of its quality.