The trajectory of the Russia meteor was significantly different than the trajectory of the asteroid 2012 DA14, which hours later made its flyby of Earth, making it a completely unrelated object.Actually, if it was a satellite of asteroid 2012 DA14, its trajectory could appear quite different from the asteroid's, depending on where it was in its orbit around the asteroid when the meteor was captured by the earth.
The only way the two trajectories could be quite different is if the orbital velocity of the impacting meteorite around the asteroid were roughly the same as the speed of the combined system of meteor/asteroid.LOL. The Vendispambot confuses velocity with trajectory. LOL.
We know the asteroid/meteor separation at the time of the impact was around a million kilometers and we know the mass of the asteroid is around 100,000 tonnes, and the mass of the meteor around 10,000 tonnes
So the force acting on the meteor by the asteroid is around 10E-14 Newtons, and impart an orbital speed of around 8mm per second.
So the the 500,000,000 mm/s velocity of the meteor could be deflected by around 10mm/s at right angles by the gravity of the flyby asteroid.
I don't think that most sane people believe that a difference of 1 part in 50 million makes much of a difference in velocity.
It should be clear by now that if you are innumerate like Uba, you will lead and ignorant and innumerate life like Uba.LOL. Says the spambot which made no allowance for the spacetime curvature around the earth in regards to the trajectory of the meteor (supposing it was a satellite of the asteroid). LOL.
Uba is free to select whatever initial conditions he likes for the position and and shape of his presumed "orbit" of the meteor around the asteroid.Yeah? How much are you willing to bet? LOL.
Uba now shows a new side of his scientific illiteracy by implying that relativistic effects will produce a significant part in the calculation of the path of a meteorite that is traveling at a mere 8 km per second. or roughly 1/50,000 the speed of light.LOL. Now the Vendispambot confuses spacetime curvature (aka gravity) with relativistic effects! LOL.
"made no allowance for the spacetime curvature around the earth" - Uba
I will bet you your life.Interesting. And what are you willing to risk?
"Gee, I wonder what might have happened had it been captured by the earth in any of an infinite number of relative positions?" - UbaGee. I don't see me mentioning a gravitational capture there. Do you just make this crap up as you go along? LOL.
Since it's velocity was greater than the escape velocity of the earth, it couldn't have been captured through gravitational effects.
And now of course Uba is running away from his earlier claim that the meteor could have had a wide range of relative velocities if it were orbiting the passing asteroid.LOL. When did I supposedly make that claim?
At a speed of 8mm per second.Will someone PLEASE unplug the Vendispambot? It's just spewing gibberish, now.
Two would go in. I would come out.Sure ...in a spambot trash can! LOL.
UbVonTard uses terms like "spacetime curvature" but has no clue that they are a concept of General Relativity.OMG. So now the Vendispambot thinks anything having to do with GR is about relativistic effects! LMAO. So much for artificial intelligence. This thing is as dumb as a box of rocks! LOL.
He then insists that "spacetime curvature" is not about relativity.Apparently, the Vendispambot doesn't understand that GR is a description of the properties of (gravity*)! LOL.
Poor Uba. he still doesn't know how to solve basic arithmetic problems.Reported for irrelevance.
"How can anyone still take this gibberish generator seriously?" - Uba
He can't add, or do basic algebra. But he insists that he knows science.
It is all part of his mental disease.
"Gee, I wonder what might have happened had it been captured by the earth in any of an infinite number of relative positions?" - UbaLOL. When did I supposedly make that overly simplistic assertion?
Since you now assert that your use of the word "capture" means collision and not gravitational capture,
it is a trivial matter to compute an answer to your question given any initial conditions.LOL. Right, and the answer is exactly what I said it was. Such a satellite could enter the earth's atmosphere at any point, from any direction.
But since you are numerically and scientifically illiterate, you are incapable of doing so.What's the matter spambot? Afraid to admit I was right all along? LOL.
By definition general relativity is about relatavistic effects.LMAO! See? It still hasn't figured out what I'm talking about (gravity).
"So now the Vendispambot thinks anything having to do with GR is about relativistic effects!" - UbaPoor Vendispambot. It can't read the dates on these posts, it can't read words (in parenthesis) it can't read words in "quotations," and it doesn't even think "it's" is a valid word! LMAO
Poor Uba. He just gets dumber and dumber with each passing moment.
Sentence 1LOL. I still don't see me mentioning a gravitational capture there. Maybe you think gravity doesn't do anything else? LOL!
"Gee. I don't see me mentioning a gravitational capture there. Do you just make this crap up as you go along?" - Uba
Sentence 2
"LMAO! See? It still hasn't figured out what I'm talking about (gravity)." - Uba
If the meteor were orbiting the fly by asteroid as Uba has asserted, then it could not have entered the earth's atmosphere at any point since the maximum deviation of it's velocity from that of it's primary (the fly by asteroid) would be on the order of 10mm per second.LOL. The Vendispambot still gets velocity mixed up with trajectory. ...too funny!
This compares to the velocity of the fly by asteroid of approximately 10,000 mm per second.LOL. Vendispambot still doesn't understand my 3rd post to this article.
This means that the meteor would have necessarily approached the earth from the same direction as the asteroid within a small fraction of a degree.
Uba has been told this at least twice, and now three times.So meteors are political now? LOL!
Yet he persists in ignoring reality and trying to escape from his error through a non stop stream of lies.
How typically Republican of him.
katesisco
Feb 17, 2013