The oceans flow don't ya' know and though a laboratory tank can indeed be turned into a toxic brew by filling it with local disaster area mud and adding acid, a whole ocean will not be so cooperative. Meanwhile, CO2 is greening the whole biosphere, and that's Biology 101 just as greenhouse theory is Physics 101 before activist computer modelers rely on massive 3X amplification of any warming by utterly speculative positive water vapor feedback, their models being as removed from a cloud-filled atmosphere as much as a tank is from a real ocean. Bacteria love metal ions, but such ecosystems do not survive sitting in an aquarium all month! Now excuse me while I play more Glenn Beck re-runs now that my work here today is enough to earn another Koch brothers donation.

-=NikFromNYC=-, Ph.D. in carbon chemistry (Columbia U.) with additional laboratory background in DNA/protein interaction (UofMN), organometallic synthesis (UofMN), and nanotechnology (Harvard).

Ah, the "CO2 is plant food" Crock.

http://www.youtub...index=65

Denialists like Nik are incapable of learning.

A YouTube video on: (1) some random Russian drought TV report, (2) a random flood in Iran TV report, (3) rogue scientist ("reverse the null hypothesis" for global warming but in Climategate e-mail lamented that missing ocean heat was a "travesty" since it could not be accounted for) claiming that droughts/floods are getting worse despite down trends in actual historical data, (4) a random flood in Iowa on TV, (5) sound bites read from a non-peer reviewed activist report about droughts/floods overwhelming fertilization despite actual data about double digit percentage boosts in actual crop yields in the last decade, (6) a Natl. Wildlife Fed. sweater girl doing her own flood panic newscast, (7) a Chinese TV report, etc.

None of these have anything to do with disproving the basic learnings of every school kid who takes a biology class. TV clips of stormy weather interspersed with Lord Monckton testifying that CO2 is plant food is textbook propaganda, not a form of valid argument.

Funny I thought Nik was just being sarcastic.

Lord Who?

Monckton is no Lord. You have been suckered by his dishonest presentation of himself. In fact the house of Lords denied him the title.

Now (Almost Lord) Monckton has claimed among other things to have a cure for cancer, aids, and a host of other diseases in some nutritional supplement.

"TV clips of stormy weather interspersed with Lord Monckton testifying" - NikkieTard

Do you believe the Lord of medical Quackery, (not quite Lord) Monckton?

http://www.youtub...lShU6zD0

CO2 is plant food, but for some reason the Earth has lost the ability to sink more than man can produce.
In general, poisons are alkalai, so in some realms there should be neutralizing effects. It is a rare acid that is harmful, except that it will burn the heck out of you or cause acidosis.
@Nik, how about a non-computer model, one that has work perfectly and predictively for 30 years?
http://www.facebo...4557455/

Meanwhile, CO2 is greening the whole biosphere

Bullshit is also plant food, but if you cover your roses with 6 feet of the stuff, they won't grow so well.

and that's Biology 101

Would you consider taking some more advanced courses, then?

Nik says;
activist computer modelers
I AM an ACTIVIST COMPUTER MODELER! Do you want to say it to my face? I can speculate anything you want because people don't have a clue if they are not guided to a conclusion. In the mean-time CO2 is greening the whole blogosphere.

Great post. very fine sarcasm.

Howhot-hey it should be trivial to demonstrate the effects of releasing heat into the Earth at ground-level near populations. (Basically 100% absorption) How about you confirm my model? I can help out with phenomenology, if you need it.

the point is if you unbalance a field massively adding anything you get a change, and massive is amount short time > species don't get a chance to switch their habits/DNA to survive. So our answer should be : What is important for us to keep balanced around us ? in order to survive the massive changes we need to produce.(or not) Cheers