Let's hope so, as this process, as it stands, will go nowhere fast, due to its dependence upon a very expensive rare earth in short supply
Let's hope so, as this process, as it stands, will go nowhere fast, due to its dependence upon a very expensive rare earth in short supply
Gallium is not a "rare earth".
Gallium is not even particularly rare (which is different from being a "rare earth") - it is more plentiful in earth's crust than lead or tin, for example.
Furthermore gallium is not consumed in this process.
The small crystal size is more likely to be a problem than the gallium is.
Caliban
Jan 24, 2013Let's hope so, as this process, as it stands, will go nowhere fast, due to its dependence upon a very expensive rare earth in short supply, that --in an of itself-- presents some very high environmental costs, which I doubt have been factored into the calculation of the "greenness" of this process.
Perhaps some serendipitous discovery of a cheap, abundant and less environmentally damaging "liquid metal" can be found, but until then, this discovery is only an interesting experimental demonstration.