I fail to understand the unending urge to create electronic media to advertize the amazing color or sound of a product for the express purpose of letting me see or hear it over the internet.

Assuming the camera used could even properly quantify the vibrancy of said device, I'm absolutely positive that I would not know any better, even if the TV had twice the color vibrancy of the monitor I'm using to watch the video of it on.

It's like trying to show how great a 4k tv is on a 720p video without zooming in on it.

You've got to be a little more creative when advertising something that that presumably has greater properties than the ability of media used to distribute the advertisements.

People will be adjusting the color saturation in any case to suit their personal preferences. I fail to see how this makes for a better TV viewing experience.

I fail to see how this makes for a better TV viewing experience.

In essence, that's what I'm saying - Without actually factually seeing it in person, we cannot see if it actually provides a compelling benefit.

Yeah, but if it increases interest in the product and differentiates it from it's competitors, then it is successful advertisement.

I'll bet you are both still interested enough to check it out in person if the opportunity presents itself.

I can see where using pure red, blue, and green would reduce the contamination from the wider range of frequencies that would pass through each of the color filters. That would allow the LCD's to create a more exact match for the pixal value specified by the image sensor that recorded it. That should improve the pictures color quality.

Or not, would have to see it to be sure.

And the price is half as much as today's LCD TV's?!! All right!! It didn't actually say that in the article, but since price wasn't mentioned, it's safe to assume the prices will drop by 50%.

the really dissapointing this about this "article" is the complete failure of the author to do anything but paraphrase the promo material. How about taking some readings of the color accuracy and posting those compared to a non-quantum-dot tv? too hard?

Sounds great! I want to know how it compares with OLED.

the really dissapointing this about this "article" is the complete failure of the author to do anything but paraphrase the promo material.

This is an aggregation site. Not a site where authored/original articles are posted.

If we actually lived in an Ektachrome world, this would be great.

But we don't, at least not so I've noticed. No need to juice up the color on your TV screen to the point of unreality.

Not that I'm against increasing gamut, but I wonder if this is a little like 4k - the capability is there, but no media to take advantage of it.
Cameras, recorded content (discs, older analog tapes, films, etc.), digital encoding techniques for transmission, are likely designed for smaller gamuts.