Cool. I love a good mystery.
[cynical]Every good mystery will become a bad mystery after having been explained by DM.[/cynical]
Just because these fools are so far behind the rest of us, doesn't make their false interpretations correct.
Scale it up 100,000 times, replace the star with a galaxy, and replace the planets with dwarf galaxies. viola. Most orbital systems should eventually decay to disks with a single massive entity in the center, if they stick around long enough.So are you saying that all planets must eventually turn into asteroid belts? This must go against absolutely all of your formal training in celestial mechanics.
it's unclear why the dancers – dwarf galaxies – are dancing in a ring around the much larger Andromeda GalaxyIt's just another example of prominent dark matter ring feature, which not only drags the tiny particles of interstellar gas, but even much heavier objects apparently. The dwarf galaxies are itself rich of dark matter (neutrinos evaporated from it), so they tend to interact strongly with dark matter clouds around galaxies. At the case of smaller bodies the same drag is known as so-called fly-by anomaly (it manifest itself at the equatorial plane of Earth only). Some theories of dark matter predict these rings too. The toroidal cloud of neutrinos around Sun manifest itself with radioactive decay anomalies, as it rotates with synchrony with core of Sun, not its surface.
"....perhaps this is some relict of a collision between a proto-Andromeda and another galaxy..."
And a likely candidate is the third most massive galaxy in the Local Group, M33. Besides having overlapping outer halos and swapped globular clusters, a bridge of neutral hydrogen has been discovered between the two galaxies. One recent paper envisions a close encounter between Andromeda and M33 between 4-8 Gyr ago: http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1161
Arp's theory that quasars are proto-galaxies that evolve into mature spiral galaxiesThis idea was proposed with quasars founder Maarten Schmidt in 1963 already. The Schmidt law for density/luminosity correlation in star-forming galaxies is named after him. Please avoid your usual plasma universe propaganda here, as the above effect has nothing to do with charged particles or "plasma threads".
This idea was proposed with quasars founder Maarten Schmidt in 1963 already. The Schmidt law for density/luminosity correlation in star-forming galaxies is named after him. Please avoid your usual plasma universe propaganda here, as the above effect has nothing to do with charged particles or "plasma threads".
I hold Tesla in very high regardYou shouldn't believe to anybody, you shouldn't ignore no one. So I'm checking all information for myself. It's laborious approach, but it pays off. The fact, Nicola Tesla was aetherist, genius and essentially correct with his scalar waves findings doesn't mean, he never did merely political proclamations. Regarding the Boskovic, the famous Tesla's nationalism and the fact, Boskovich was Serbian like Nicola Tesla played undoubtedly its role in the above proclamation. It's nothing new for me: many other Serbians tend to overestimate the actual contribution of Boskovich into science. Every small nation seeks for its iconic persons in rather noncritical way.
Looks like Lurk missed the co-rotation aspect. Planets don't orbit stars co-rotationally , hence each planet has it's own rotational period. Invoking DM may explain the motion of the dwarf galaxies...this could be tested by pinpointing where the concentrations of DM should be to explain the motion and look for evidence of a lensing effect in those regions.
Or it could be my favourite fundamental force:
http://www.youtub...lyiW-xGI
This is 53 minutes, personally i found it well worth the watch and eagerly await parts 2-5.
Looks like Lurk missed the co-rotation aspect. Planets don't orbit stars co-rotationally , hence each planet has it's own rotational period. Invoking DM may explain the motion of the dwarf galaxies...this could be tested by pinpointing where the concentrations of DM should be to explain the motion and look for evidence of a lensing effect in those regions.
Or it could be my favourite fundamental force:
http://www.youtub...lyiW-xGI
This is 53 minutes, personally i found it well worth the watch and eagerly await parts 2-5.
it could be my favourite fundamental forceAnd you were even upvoted for it with Caliban, TheGhostofOtto1923 and Q-Star (lite). Do you really believe, that the galaxy can be modeled with discharge between magnets?
it could be my favourite fundamental forceAnd you were even upvoted for it with Caliban, TheGhostofOtto1923 and Q-Star (lite). Do you really believe, that the galaxy can be modeled with discharge between magnets?
With the "subtle" problem: there are no electrodes
This is just a homology not analogy, as the streamers around galaxies are formed with neutrinos or even more lightweight particles WITHOUT electromagnetic charge. The solutions of Maxwell's theory, fluids and gravitomagnetism , so they could be confused easily at the phenomenological level. But they do apply to different distance/energy density scales. That is to say, the particles of plasma (ionized atom nuclei) can be present in these streamers like any other particles trapped in it (there exist a theory, in which charged particles should be dragged with neutrino flux more, than the uncharged one) - but their mass is negligible with compare to amount of dark matter, which is actually driving this flux.
CD85......meet A2G
"intrinsic magnetic fields"
Q-Star
Jan 2, 2013