How is this a sign of Global warming? I would say it's a sign of arctic warming.Did you forget what planet you are on, gregor1? Are you now denying warming? Even for a conservative that's retarded.
There is no denying the arctic has been warming, in fact , it's warming at pretty much the same rate that it warmed between 1910 and 1930.
So was 1910-1930 like that?
We don't know but we do know that it's warming now at much the same rate as the early twentieth century
We don't know but we do know that it's warming now at much the same rate as the early twentieth century when co2 was not an issue
How does warming in one region provide evidence that the entire globe is warming?
How does warming in one region provide evidence that the entire globe is warming...
How does warming in one region provide evidence that the entire globe is warming? We already know the Arctic is warmingIt's call diffusion and convection, Forest
gregor has a point....Yes, that US public schools are little more than holding pens
How does warming in one region provide evidence that the entire globe is warming?
Local changes in climate are no more indicative of GW than the record cold in India at the moment are signs are a sign of global cooling.Your schoolteacher never taught you the difference between weather and climate. Hint: Rain is weather. Desert is climate
I've no doubt Howie, that you see Global Warming every where. No doubt you see it in the tea leaves as well.
Local changes in climate are no more indicative of GW than the record cold in India at the moment are signs are a sign of global cooling.
How is this a sign of Global warming? I would say it's a sign of arctic warming.
This of course is the same curry that published the ground breaking research that the sun is a solid ball of iron.
"Here's a link for you" - Gregor1
But wait... Gregor's reference contains the mother of all hockey stick graphs.
https://docs.goog...4dUgzdVE
Religionists only care about preserving the life of cell clusters and zygotes. Once they pop out of the womb, religionists want them converted or killed. Whatever is more expedient. The Earth is just a battleground for them. They couldn't care if the oceans boil or the nukes explode. In fact that gets the job done faster. It's all part of putting sinners in hell and putting on a good show for their creator so they'll be sucked into eternity.
1, Nobody wants "sinners" to go to hell.Wow a "Hate the system, not da playa" appeal, right? Sorry I stopped playing with imaginary friends long ago.
2, Anybody trying to "put on a a show" for the creator would actually be in violation of fundamental Christian doctrine and theology.That would include every Abrahamic religion.
3, The rest of your post is just crap which is clearly wrong and ridiculous.I always find that amusing, coming from outspoken proponents of irrationality.
Scientists say new signs of global warming in Russian ArcticWell, don't look now, but it's already shaping up to be an interesting season:
Uba - care to speculate why? Or would you defer to recognized experts (who will give reasons you won't like).You seem to be implying it's because of AGW. How would you feel if it was less snow than usual? Would it be global warming then, too? How about if it did the statistically improbable, and snowed exactly average? What then? Would this mean global warming just doesn't yet appear to have an effect?
"Global" climate means "global". Not just the snow covered regions of the Northern Hemisphere. You've heard this before but I guess it bears repeating.Certainly. It's about the global temperatures:
gregor1
Nov 21, 2012